[NCUC-DISCUSS] NomCom changes

Johan Helsingius julf at Julf.com
Wed Jun 5 20:30:46 CEST 2024


Thank you for the useful information, Remmy,

> The final recommendations were made including our desire to increase and 
> re-balance the slots and were submitted to the ICANN board and it did 
> not sail through as expected. (Raoul Plommer can also add a voice here)

I am, like Pedro, a bit confused about this - did the team actually
recommend re-balancing, but the board removed it, or did the team
decide to remove the recommendation from the final version that
went to the board?

> On the call for term duration, I would advise that current appointees 
> have 1 additional year, since that would mean they are not returning and 
> must have availed some ‘knowledge transfer’ on the new or incoming 
> appointees before their final exit thereafter.

That would be the sensible thing to do, yes, but that doesn't seem
to be what the recommendation says.

	Julf


More information about the Ncuc-discuss mailing list