[NCUC-DISCUSS] NomCom changes

[Pedro de Perdigão Lana]

Hi Remmy,

Sorry, I was finishing writing while you were sending your message, and a
part of it caught my attention in your answer because I may have
misunderstood something from the wiki. Was Recommendation 10 submitted to
the ICANN board, or was it withdrawn before it, because of the
above-mentioned OEC behavior?

Cordially,

*Pedro de Perdigão Lana*
Lawyer <https://www.nic.br/>, GEDAI/UFPR <https://www.gedai.com.br/>
Researcher
PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra)
Board Member @ NCUC (ICANN) <https://www.ncuc.org/>, ISOC BR
<https://isoc.org.br/>, CC Brasil <https://br.creativecommons.net/> and IODA
<https://ioda.org.br/>
This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by
mistake, please reply informing it.


Em qua., 5 de jun. de 2024 às 13:28, Remmy Nweke <remmyn at gmail.com>
escreveu:

> Thanks Johan
>
> Regarding the NomCom2 Review recommendations, its unfortunate that despite
> our presentations and ‘fight’ to have slots expanded or rebalanced to
> accommodate at least the GNSO constituents appropriately, those who have
> more slots refused to relinquish such slots to upscale adequate
> representations since there was a lull in increasing the slots.
>
>
> The final recommendations were made including our desire to increase and
> re-balance the slots and were submitted to the ICANN board and it did not
> sail through as expected. (Raoul Plommer can also add a voice here)
>
>
> On the call for term duration, I would advise that current appointees have
> 1 additional year, since that would mean they are not returning and must
> have availed some ‘knowledge transfer’ on the new or incoming appointees
> before their final exit thereafter.
>
> As regards to the implementation work plan, I think its error since NCSG
> is our umbrella, we can also highlight this in our response or at best
> wherever NCUC occurs or appears should be replaced with NCSG/NCUC/NPOC.
>
> I hope this helps.
> ___________________
> REMMY NWEKE,  *mNUJ, mNGE, mGOCOP*
> Lead Consulting Strategist/Group Executive Editor,
> *ITREALMS Media* group [*Multiple-award winning medium*]
> (ITREALMS <http://www.itrealms.com.ng/>, DigitalSENSE Business Magazine
> <http://www.digitalsenseafrica.com.ng/businessnews>; NaijaAgroNet
> <http://www.naijaagronet.com.ng/>)
> No. 36 Afariogun Street, Oshodi-Lagos
> M: 234-8033592762, 8023122558, T: @ITRealms
> <http://www.twitter.com/ITRealms>
> @DigitalSENSEng
> 2023 *Nigeria DigitalSENSE Forum on IG4D*, Thursday June 8
> <https://www.itrealms.com.ng/>
> 2023 *ITREALMS* e-Waste Dialogue, Thursday December 7
> <https://www.itrealms.com.ng/>
> @Welcome Center Hotels, Int'l Airport Road, Lagos-Nigeria
> <http://welcomecentrehotels.com/>
> Former Vice President, African Civil Society on Information Society (ACSIS)
> ______________________________________________________________
> *Confidentiality Notice:* The information in this document and attachments
> are confidential and may also be privileged information. It is intended
> only for the use of the named recipient. Remmy Nweke does not accept legal
> responsibility for the contents of this e-mail. If you are not the
> intended
> recipient, please notify me immediately, then delete this document and do
> not disclose the contents of this document to any other person, nor make
> any copies. Violators may face court persecution.
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 7:52 AM Johan Helsingius via Ncuc-discuss <
> ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org> wrote:
>
>> The NomCom2 Review produced 27 recommendations. Unfortunately the bylaws
>> amendments made no change to the number and nature of delegates from the
>> GNSO (i.e., 1 each from the RySG, RrSG, ISPCP,  IPC, NCSG/NCUC, and 2
>> from the BC), so we will still be severely under-represented in the
>> NomCom. The length of terms were extended to two years for all groups
>> (some had 1-year terms previously), and there is a limit of at most
>> two consecutive terms.
>>
>> Strangely the recommendations contain a major inconsistency in, on
>> one hand, wanting to avoid an "all newbies" situation and thus
>> insisting on staggered terms (so only half of nomcom would be replaced
>> every year) but then stating that in introducing the new terms,
>> all reps have to be newly appointed, starting their term at the
>> 2024 AGM (and existing reps can't be reappointed). To deal with
>> the dilemma, GNSO is asked to decide (by toss of coin) which
>> reps get a special 1-year term instead of the normal 2-year one.
>>
>> I would love to hear from our reps on the team what the rationale
>> for this is, and that is why I am copying our representatives
>> on the NomCom Review Implementation Working Group, Ines Hfaiedh,
>> Raoul Plommer and Remmy Nweke as well as our current NomCom
>> representative Pascal Bekono, hoping they can shed some light
>> on the recommendation, as well as help explain why the representation
>> issue wasn't addressed.
>>
>>         Julf
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20240605/dc11a26e/attachment.htm>