[NCUC-DISCUSS] [2022-NomCom] NomCom Selection Announcement for ICANN Leadership Positions

Tue Aug 16 02:14:46 CEST 2022

Hi Akinremi,

Thanks for engaging and giving clarifications.
I would like to add some points based on what you shared:
- ticking all boxes: I am not sure to get the correct meaning here but I
assume that means candidates match all criteria set in the job description
or expression of interest. I have a concern there as any list of criteria
is usually based on must and nice to have, to emphasize what is really
important and critical.
 A job description shouldn't not laundry list which end up excluding too
many potential candidates.  I want also to add that if we review the
criteria or what is looked for, many of them are subjective even if we try
to create some proxies or indirect way to assess them, they remain however
elusively subjective and with a risk of bias. Even in term of recruitment
practice, the purpose is to find someone who can find and help who might
lack some nice to have expertise, some competencies can be improved and
understand that even current board got some trainings etc.
- quality application: again that can be questionable as it should made
clear what is expected as "good" or "poor" application. I see this as
possible hinder for those outside ICANN. what would mean objectively a non
good application? missing some information?didn't develop some points or
highlights expected by nomcom? missing some critical skills or competencies
that can be verified or other soft skills that can be hard to judge from an
application only?
- reapplying candidates: I see you made the point linking poor application
and potential candidates not reapplying. I am not sure to get the relation
here but with regard to candidates to reapply, I think nomcom can improve
that. the application has a "cost" for candidates with filling form, asking
people to recommend them and then writing down a recommendation or filling
form etc . I understand that nomcom made several steps and checkpoints in
order to judge candidates and narrow down but that also add effort for
candidates. That effort can be a reason for them to not reapply if they are
not sure about possible success (we are dealing with human beings). nomcom
can help by giving more clear  and specific feedback about non selection
like indicating areas or skills to be improved etc. I understand that much
work but that could be more effective in long run to ensure bigger pool of
candidates and also help to evaluate objectively .

I want also to add one comment as ICANN accountability co-rapporteur for
ws2 diversity subgroup. I have feeling of deja-vu, deja-entendu regarding
the arguments of competency vs diversity and that is why I advice caution
as some might imply that working toward diversity means lowering standards,
which is not the case in  any way.

I hope that can be useful for next nomcom, as you will be our rep for one
more term there.

Best,
Rafik

Le lun. 15 août 2022 à 23:20, Akinremi Peter Taiwo <compsoftnet at gmail.com>
a écrit :

> Thanks Kathy and other folks. It was really a hard task to select few
> from over 60 applications that was received.
>
> @Kaswesha Your concern is valid but you will agree with me that having to
> select few from many applications is more challenging, hence, need for
> quality, I mean quality application.
>
> @Farzaneh NomCom evaluates based on the criteria provided and the quality
> of application that was received. Each of the selected candidate was
> weighed against such criteria that was provided to the NomCom. My apologies
> as I won’t be able to go in-depth because of the confidential nature of the
> NomCom. But I can tell you that we have excellent female candidates but
> unfortunately did not tick all boxes.
>
> I feel the concern that rotating people in and out might not necessarily
> contribute to community vitality, I guess that goes beyond the remit of
> NomCom. This is a concern that the community might need to find a way to
> address. And for the IPC members being overrepresented on the GNSO council
> should be a concern. It was not part of the criteria received by the NomCom
> for the selection.
>
> Yes, I agree that NomCom need to do more outreach. But again, how do we
> address the issue of poor application and the concern of losing potential
> candidate of not reapplying for NomCom positions bearing in mind that
> NomCom has few positions to fill.
>
> @Stephenie, You will see that from the selected candidates we have fresh
> blood that have no ICANN experience and background. NomCom will learn from
> this and ensure more outreach is done.
>
> @Shreedeep In my personal opinion, we need to encourage more quality
> application. And encourage those that is applying to put in more effort
> into the application. Again, NomCom is limited based on the number of
> positions to be filed.
>
> @Gleen Diversity is key but should we slide competency under the carpet
> because of diversity. I can tell you that NomCom was very concerned of the
> diversity on the board as well as in every stakeholder group.
>
> @Rafik You are not mistaking.  What I can only say on this is that NomCom
> was keen on competency and diversity. Reason why we should encourage those
> that is applying to submit good application. This is not to say that the
> application received wasn’t good. It is unfortunate that we had to select
> few from many good applications. It was a tough decision.
>
> @Shah Good question. I guess this might be to the broader ICANN ecosystem
> to answer and see how to motivate experience folks to apply for GNSO,
> ATLARGE, ccNSO positions.
>
> @Bruna. Thanks for raising that, it will be communicated. It was sad for
> NomCom for not seeing female made it to the board. I am sure this would be
> address going forward.
>
> I would like to thanK every person that responded. It clearly shows our
> interest in helping ICANN to get better especially that of NomCom process.
> I am pressed to divulge more information, but I am also constrained by the
> NomCom confidentiality.
>
>
>
>  I hope you all understand.
>
>
> Apologies for the typo.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 1:17 PM Bruna Martins dos Santos <
> bruna.mrtns at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello, all,
>>
>> I am sorry to be joining this thread later but I happen to agree with
>> Farzaneh that its really unfortunate that we did not have any female board
>> appointee and to also see the regional diversity shrinking as pointed out
>> by Rafik. I understand that other parts of the world might have had to
>> change thair focus and work perspectives during the pandemic and even scale
>> down their engagement with ICANN but thats no excuse for the org to
>> continue experiencing a board constellation that is nowhere near gender
>> parity - and speaking as a female member of the community leadership,  i
>> really hoped that the NomCom had this in mind.
>>
>> Do we think it would be the case of writing a letter or asking for a
>> meeting with NomCom in one of the upcoming meetings ? id be happy to help
>> facilitate.
>>
>> Best,
>> Bruna
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Aug 14, 2022 at 9:57 PM Remmy Nweke <remmyn at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Weldone Peter for sharing
>>> ___________________
>>> REMMY NWEKE,  *mNUJ, mNGE, mGOCOP*
>>> Lead Consulting Strategist/Group Executive Editor,
>>> *ITREALMS Media* group [*Multiple-award winning medium*]
>>> (ITREALMS <http://www.itrealms.com.ng/>, DigitalSENSE Business Magazine
>>> <http://www.digitalsenseafrica.com.ng/businessnews>; NaijaAgroNet
>>> <http://www.naijaagronet.com.ng/>)
>>> No. 36 Afariogun Street, Oshodi-Lagos
>>> M: 234-8033592762, 8023122558, T: @ITRealms
>>> <http://www.twitter.com/ITRealms>
>>> @DigitalSENSEng
>>> 2022 *Nigeria DigitalSENSE Forum on IG4D*, Thursday June 9
>>> <https://www.itrealms.com.ng/>
>>> 2022 *ITREALMS* e-Waste Dialogue, Thursday December 8
>>> <https://www.itrealms.com.ng/>
>>> @Welcome Center Hotels, Int'l Airport Road, Lagos-Nigeria
>>> <http://welcomecentrehotels.com/>
>>> Former Vice President, African Civil Society on Information Society
>>> (ACSIS)
>>> ______________________________________________________________
>>> *Confidentiality Notice:* The information in this document and
>>> attachments
>>> are confidential and may also be privileged information. It is intended
>>> only for the use of the named recipient. Remmy Nweke does not accept
>>> legal
>>> responsibility for the contents of this e-mail. If you are not the
>>> intended
>>> recipient, please notify me immediately, then delete this document and
>>> do
>>> not disclose the contents of this document to any other person, nor make
>>> any copies. Violators may face court persecution.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Aug 13, 2022 at 9:33 AM Akinremi Peter Taiwo <
>>> compsoftnet at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Dear colleagues,
>>>>
>>>> I am happy to let you know that the Nomcom selection has been finally
>>>> published on the website. Below are the people selected to ICANN leadership
>>>> positions to begin their term in September 2022.
>>>>
>>>> *ICANN Board of Directors*
>>>> Maarten Botterman
>>>> Europe
>>>>
>>>> Christopher Chapman
>>>> Asia, Australia, Pacific Islands
>>>>
>>>> Sajidur Rahman
>>>> Asia, Australia, Pacific Islands
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *Public Technical Identifiers Board of Directors*
>>>> Tobias Sattler
>>>> Europe
>>>>
>>>> *At-Large Advisory Committee*
>>>> Eduardo Díaz
>>>> North America
>>>>
>>>> Tommi Karttaavi
>>>> Europe
>>>>
>>>> *Country Code Names Supporting Organization Council*
>>>> Olga Cavalli
>>>> Latin America and the Caribbean
>>>>
>>>> *Generic Names Supporting Organization Council*
>>>> Anne Aikman-Scalese
>>>> North America
>>>>
>>>> More information of the process can be found here:
>>>> https://www.icann.org/en/announcements/details/icanns-2022-nominating-committee-announces-leadership-selections-11-08-2022-en
>>>>
>>>> Regards.
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>>>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>>>> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>>> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> *Bruna Martins dos Santos *
>>
>> German Chancellor Fellow 21' (Bundeskanzler-Stipendiatin) | Alexander
>> von Humboldt Foundation <https://www.humboldt-foundation.de/>
>>
>> Visiting Researcher (Gastwissenschaftlerin) | Wissenschaftszentrum
>> Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB) <https://wzb.eu/en>
>>
>> Member | Coalizão Direitos na Rede <https://direitosnarede.org.br/>
>> Chair | Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group at ICANN
>> <https://gnso.icann.org/en/about/stakeholders-constituencies/ncsg>
>> Co-Coordinator | Internet Governance Caucus  <https://igcaucus.org/>
>>
>> Twitter: @boomartins <https://twitter.com/boomartins> // Skype:
>> bruna.martinsantos
>> *bruna.martinsdossantos at wzb.eu <bruna.martinsdossantos at wzb.eu>* and
>> bruna.mrtns at gmail.com
>>
>
>
> --
> Best regards
>
> *Taiwo Peter Akinremi*
> ------ ------ -------  ------ ------ -------  ------ ------ ------- ------
> ------ -------  ------ ------
> *Certified Salesforce Administrator | Data Protection Specialist | IT
> Auditor *
> *Phone*; +2348117714345, +2347063830177 *Skype*: akinremi.taiwo
> *Email:* compsoftnet at gmail.com, peterexecute at gmail.com
> ___________________________________________
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20220816/452e0f55/attachment.htm>