[NCUC-DISCUSS] David and his many positions at NCUC/NCSG/NPOC
Nadira Alaraj
nadira.araj at gmail.com
Wed Oct 10 23:38:44 CEST 2018
This email thread raises an important issue that I find contradicting to
what the
NCUC/NCSG/NPOC communities preaches. The tremendous efforts in capacity
building programs and outreach to bringing new members to contribute to the
policy work and leadership roles at the same time the stated bylaws doesn't
help on this regards.
Thanks Tapani for pointing that the bylaws does allows that. I think it
might be that these bylaws were put at the time when there were few
volunteers. But now the community is growing, hence there is need to
revisit these bylaws to encourage new members to get into the leadership
roles as an incentive to their actual contributions to the community work
whether it is in policy or on managerial work.
I suggest to add this suggestion on the agenda for discussion at ICANN 63
meeting.
Best wishes
Nadira
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018, 22:31 Tapani Tarvainen <ncuc at tapani.tarvainen.info>
wrote:
> This discussion has become a bit weird. After all:
>
> * There's nothing in any bylaws or charters against being in NCUC EC
> and NPOC EC at the same time.
>
> * There's no inherent conflict of interest between NCUC and NPOC, and
> should there be such in some individual case, David presumably will
> recuse himself.
>
> * David make his plan perfectly clear before the election, voters knew
> it and voted him in.
>
> Admittedly this is a completely new situation, and it is an open
> question how well it will work, but NCUC members have chosen to let
> David try it. If it does cause problems, by all means let's fix them,
> but I find it odd people are saying we should try to prevent this
> situation from reoccurring before we've seen how it works out now.
>
> As for travel slots, I would find it inappropriate if David were to
> declare he'll only accept them from one constituency. Whatever he
> does, he should treat NCUC and NPOC as equally as possible. Of course
> this situation calls for more cooperation and coordination between
> NCUC and NPOC ECs than before, but I don't think that's a bad
> thing.
>
> --
> Tapani Tarvainen
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20181011/e6163a46/attachment.html>
More information about the Ncuc-discuss
mailing list