[NCUC-DISCUSS] David and his many positions at NCUC/NCSG/NPOC

[Tapani Tarvainen]

This discussion has become a bit weird. After all:

* There's nothing in any bylaws or charters against being in NCUC EC
and NPOC EC at the same time.

* There's no inherent conflict of interest between NCUC and NPOC, and
should there be such in some individual case, David presumably will
recuse himself.

* David make his plan perfectly clear before the election, voters knew
it and voted him in.

Admittedly this is a completely new situation, and it is an open
question how well it will work, but NCUC members have chosen to let
David try it. If it does cause problems, by all means let's fix them,
but I find it odd people are saying we should try to prevent this
situation from reoccurring before we've seen how it works out now.

As for travel slots, I would find it inappropriate if David were to
declare he'll only accept them from one constituency. Whatever he
does, he should treat NCUC and NPOC as equally as possible. Of course
this situation calls for more cooperation and coordination between
NCUC and NPOC ECs than before, but I don't think that's a bad
thing.

-- 
Tapani Tarvainen
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20181010/1d48e131/attachment.sig>