[NCUC-DISCUSS] Statement on Transparency and Off-list Communication

[Rafik Dammak]

Hi Renata,

I just finished the Council extraordinary call and it is already 23:00 but
I felt the need to respond here as you are making dangerous statements.

I may understand that you feel attacked and questioned but anyone in a
leadership position can tell you that they have faced that in time and has
to deal with it. We all faced that at some time during our terms. is it
pleasant? of course not but as leaders, we got to respond calmly and
explain our reasons. we may be right or wrong but at the end, that doesn't
matter, but we owe responses to our members as part of accountability and
being responsible. I have no position on the issue faced by the EC to be
shared on the list and only wish them good luck and I am pretty sure of
theirs genuine reasons.

You are bringing NCSG PC to this issue which is unfair and without any
valid reason. As I am the NCSG Policy Committee chair, I am trying to
understand what you mean by bullies there and take responsibility if there
is any problem. If someone has an issue or complaint, he or she can report
that to NCSG chair and/or to me when needed and they can be ensured that
their inquiry will be taken into account and seriously investigated. I
don't think going through 3rd party is the right way to do so. Some
discussion can be tense but I don't recall anyone dismissed, attacked or
pushed. people can check the PC list as all our deliberations are there or
check the recordings of NCSG policy call as we discuss policy matters
there.

to be honest what you are saying is definitely an attack and unfortunately
trying to deflect an issue you have on another group. That is really
inappropriate and not helpful.

Best,

Rafik

Le mar. 12 juin 2018 à 22:32, Renata Aquino Ribeiro <raquino at gmail.com> a
écrit :

> Hi
>
> Yes, the Chair opposed this statement.
>
> I believe all the conversation on time constraints on volunteers and
> NCUC production has been addressed, multiple times.
>
> I also believe it is very comfortable to hide behind accusations of
> lack of transparency when one did not contribute to writing ABRs or
> getting into an agreement about an NCUC IGF Proposal.
>
> NCSG is our umbrella organization and members who are more active
> there just come here to intimidate and attack.
>
> We have close to zero candidates to PC NCSG Committee because no one
> wants to work with bullies there. I spend half of my time replying to
> members who feel that these attacks are out of line.
>
> I will not empower these attacks.
>
> Best,
>
> Renata
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20180612/ae223870/attachment.html>