[NCUC-DISCUSS] [Request for Comment] NCUC meeting with GAC

[Nick Shorey]

All,

I agree with Stephanie's comment and endorse Ayden's proposal (and the way
he's framed it as a global issue) for the GAC session.

Kind regards,

Nick

*Nick Shorey*
Phone: +44 (0) 7552 455 988
Email: lists at nickshorey.com
Skype: nick.shorey
Twitter: @nickshorey
LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/nicklinkedin
Web: www.nickshorey.com

On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 1:45 AM, Stephanie Perrin <
stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca> wrote:

> In my view, all government reps to the GAC need to consult their Justice
> Departments, and not just the criminal law or cybercrime divisions.  There
> are constitutional, due process, and data protection issues which are
> raised by the data handling practices at ICANN.  The DPAs need to remain
> independent.
>
> Stephanie Perrin
>
> On 2017-10-18 19:08, Ayden Férdeline wrote:
>
> I think it would be worth asking how and with whom GAC members consult on
> matters to do with privacy and data protection. Maybe we could offer them
> some pointers on who we think they should be speaking with, and when, and
> make it clear that they need to go out and seek the advice of Data
> Protection Authorities (DPA). Law enforcement might be proactive, coming to
> them — however the onus is on the GAC members to get their national DPA
> involved at times.
>
> It depends who is at the table in our meeting with them, but if the
> participants are global, I'd suggest we avoid framing this as a European
> battle, because the principles that GDPR encompasses are the same ones
> which can be found in the OECD Privacy Framework and the CoE's Convention
> 108, among other non-binding and binding documents.
>
> Best wishes, Ayden
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [NCUC-DISCUSS] [Request for Comment] NCUC meeting with GAC
> Local Time: 16 October 2017 12:28 AM
> UTC Time: 15 October 2017 23:28
> From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com
> To: farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com> <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
> NCUC-discuss <ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org> <ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>
>
> Hi Farzaneh,
>
> Thanks for sharing this,
> looks fine with me. for privacy, I understand that is about GDPR? we
> discussed that during the last NCSG call and there was a proposal to
> approach GAC on the topic.
> what is the format of the joint meetings with GAC? the only experience we
> have is the GAC-GNSO and GAC-Board meetings, which is not what we are
> looking for probably.
>
> Best,
>
> Rafik
>
> 2017-10-16 8:22 GMT+09:00 farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>:
>
>> As you know we will meet with GAC for half an hour in Abu Dhabi.
>>
>> The idea of meeting with them is to tell them who we are, what we do.
>>
>> Also we want to discuss: jurisdiction and privacy and if time allows Geo
>> names.
>>
>> Any comments on the topics or our approach to the meeting?
>>
>> Best
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Farzaneh
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing listNcuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.orghttps://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20171022/81362f34/attachment.html>