[NCUC-DISCUSS] IGF Brazil - we were approved! - 1 out 3 but still...

[Renata Aquino Ribeiro]

Right, about that

I will put the most names I can for the travel support process of CGIbr

But

Criteria undecipherable
Selection committee unimaginable

Look at it this way

If you are selected, it will be like winning the lottery :D

I am looking into solidarity accomodation in Rio




Em 4 de out de 2017 6:26 PM, "Gustavo Paiva" <gdp.direito at gmail.com>
escreveu:

> That's great news, Renata! I am eager to see all of you in november.
>
> Em 4 de out de 2017 18:01, "Renata Aquino Ribeiro" <raquino at gmail.com>
> escreveu:
>
>> Dear all
>>
>> Incredibly NCUC proposal on a workshop on dot-amazon was approved for IGF
>> Brazil
>> This proposal also counts w/ NCSG members
>>
>> Unfortunately the other 2 proposals which just had members
>> participating and other organizations were not approved.
>> I have already booked an auditorium in the city for rejected. Details to
>> follow.
>>
>> "Água mole em pedra dura tanto bate até que fura" -
>> Constant dripping wears away stone - A Brazilian proverb
>>
>> Below the proposal and comments from evaluators and approval email
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1JrkZ56p0AqTMb6D2mgfqTXOD
>> lp3tiK6jwNpqGosaOtw/edit?usp=sharing
>>
>> Thanks and congrats to all members who contributed
>>
>> very good proposal, no problems
>>
>> very good proposal, should be accepted under any conditions
>>
>> Relevant and current topic, with clear and tangible results. Excellent
>> selection of debaters, observing gender equity. However, due to the
>> large number of speakers, it is unlikely that the debate will be
>> concluded in 90 minutes, as described. I suggest changing the format
>> or decreasing the number of speakers.
>>
>> * Relevance - interesting to give visibility to the theme from the
>> emblematic case .amazon;
>>
>> * Quality - proponents are aware of the theme and the issues at stake;
>>
>> * Diversity - balanced table from the point of view of gender and with
>> people qualified for the theme in the different sectors;
>>
>> * Format - The aquarium format is interesting, but must be
>> well-mediated to allow for a greater number of submissions.
>>
>> good proposal but with a few problems
>>
>>  good proposal, it should be accepted less excessive competition;
>>
>> New gTLDs are still widely scattered to specialized forums and very
>> specific groups of individuals. While it is relevant to bring this
>> discussion into the national context, I do not believe that the
>> proposal specifically addresses this problem.
>> The discussion on the new first-level domain name "Amazon point",
>> although controversial, does not extrapolate specialized forums.
>>
>> The proponents of the session could have used that moment to actually
>> engage the debate on relevant issues, beyond the "Whom it belongs to."
>> It failed to explain the relevance of the topic, from the point of
>> view of the domain name market and on the effects of the management of
>> this use of domain by a private entity vs governments of the Amazon
>> region. Although we have the presence of a governmental member with
>> vast knowledge in the area, what is the real impact of this discussion
>> on public Internet policies in Brazil or other countries in the Amazon
>> region? What is the interest of the business sector of this region in
>> .Amazon? What are the uses and bad uses? The controversy has not been
>> put in a way that engages people who do not know what ICANN does or
>> even what the GAC is - and these are the people to engage.
>> Finally, the methodology of fishbowl was not well explained,
>> especially the dynamics of operation and the final steps of this
>> discussion.
>>
>> very good proposal, it should be accepted under any conditions
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Internet Forum 2017 <flavio at inf.ufrgs.br>
>> Date: 2017-10-04 17:30 GMT-03: 00
>> Subject: Your Internet Forum 2017 paper 177125
>> To: raquino at gmail.com
>>
>>
>> Dear Proposer
>>
>> Congratulations. Your workshop proposal "Who owns .Amazon?
>> are top-level geographic domain names and how to participate
>> ICANN decisions "submitted to the 7th Internet
>> Brazil, was accepted.
>>
>> Evaluations of your proposal can be found in URL Comments were
>> and can help you to perfect the workshop.
>>
>> Soon the organization of the VII Internet Forum in Brazil will
>> contact you with more logistical information.
>>
>> We wish the workshop very successful.
>>
>> The Evaluation Committee
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Forum da Internet 2017 <flavio at inf.ufrgs.br>
>> Date: 2017-10-04 17:30 GMT-03:00
>> Subject: Your Forum da Internet 2017 paper 177125
>> To: raquino at gmail.com
>>
>>
>> Prezado(a) proponente
>>
>> Congratulações. Sua proposta de workshop "A quem pertence .Amazon? O que
>> são nomes de domínio geográficos de primeiro nível e como participar
>> destas decisões na ICANN", submetida para o VII Fórum da Internet no
>> Brasil, foi aceita.
>>
>> As avaliações de sua proposta podem ser encontradas em URL Comentários
>> foram
>> anexados às avaliações e podem ajudá-lo(a) a aperfeiçoar o workshop.
>>
>> Em breve a organização do VII Fórum da Internet no Brasil entrará em
>> contato com você com mais informações logísticas.
>>
>> Desejamos muito sucesso na realização do workshop.
>>
>> A Comissão de Avaliação
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20171004/9c1036ae/attachment.html>