[NCUC-DISCUSS] IGF Brazil - 4th workshop denied

Renata Aquino Ribeiro raquino at gmail.com
Thu Oct 5 05:27:02 CEST 2017


Hi all

Fwding news about our 4th proposal to IGF Brazil: denied/not approved

Sorry I had forgotten about this one

This was the one on private ordering - refusal of service on DNS and hosting
Kindly drafted by Gustavo Paiva from NE BRZ unfortunately it seems
that it was interpreted as a Sao Paulo proposal and denied

That makes 1 out 4 approval

Well, who had 0 now has 25% of approval rate is still good

Comments below, machine translation

Proposals in PT only attached

----


The proposed workshop theme proves to be relevant so that an open and
plural discussion of the scope of the activities of domain registrant
organizations and hosting providers is important. Its relevancy is
more current insofar as these intermediaries may block or limit their
content in order to violate fundamental rights, such as freedom of
expression.
The proposal is adequate to the plural discussion, seeking the
participation of different points of view. It also seeks an
appropriate format in that it encourages knowledge sharing, the
presentation of the divergent views and the debate with the public
present and online.
I commend your approval.

The justification could have been more in-depth, with a more
comprehensive contextualization on the subject.
There was a lack of clarity in the description of the objectives and
contents to be contemplated in the workshop.
Regarding the diversity of the proposal, there is a reasonable balance
of the gender issue in the list of speakers / debaters. However, its
origin could be more diversified, in order to contemplate a greater
variety of states and regions of Brazil, going well beyond the state
of São Paulo.
Regarding the format, an interesting strategy was presented to
stimulate the participation / involvement of the presential and remote
audience.


The debate on the controversial subject of freedom of expression and
the blocking of domains is well justified, although it deserves a
revision of the wording. The objectives are clear, detailed, and
appropriate to the intended structure, as well as the results
targeted.......
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: JEMS_ _ Paper (Gustavo Paiva).pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 317175 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20171005/89916787/attachment-0002.pdf>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 16564.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 12458 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20171005/89916787/attachment-0003.pdf>


More information about the Ncuc-discuss mailing list