[NCUC-DISCUSS] Nomcom

[Wisdom Donkor]

I agree with you. We need to work together towards achieving a common goal.

On Monday, July 31, 2017, Khouzeifi Issakha <khouzeifi99 at gmail.com> wrote:

> In my point of view both of them were better so we dont have to worry
> about the result but let us give her time I think she Will do her best to
> work hard.
> Thank you
>
> On Monday, 31 July 2017, Wisdom Donkor <wisdom.dk at gmail.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','wisdom.dk at gmail.com');>> wrote:
>
>> I dont think there was any decision that was taken or hidden from any of
>> the group.   What i see in this case is purely administrative processes.  I
>> also dont think there was lack of transparency. Two person got nominated
>> and the two will have to go through vetting in other for the best candidate
>> to be  selected.
>>
>> What in my thinking mislead the whole process in my opinion was the +1's
>> and all the supports thinking the candidates will have to go through voting.
>>
>> So, to say the was a hidden decision and lack of transparency in the
>> process is here nor there.
>>
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *WISDOM DONKOR (S/N Eng.)*
>> E-government and Open Government Data Platforms Specialist
>> ICANN Fellow / Member, UN IGF MAG Member, ISOC Member,
>> Freedom Online Coalition (FOC) Member, Diplo Foundation Member,
>> OGP Open Data WG Member, GODAN Memember, ITAG Member
>> Email: wisdom.dk at gmail.com
>> Skype: wisdom_dk
>> facebook: facebook at wisdom_dk
>> Website: www.data.gov.gh
>> www.isoc.gh / www.itag.org.gh
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 6:30 PM, Farell Folly <farellfolly at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I agree with Tapani on this point. There is no need to hide such kind of
>>> decision to the rest of the group. If we (the group) had voted before to
>>> conduct it  this way, that is fine, otherwise it is not fair for the
>>> candidates or to the members to discover some rules or criteria once the
>>> results are announced.
>>>
>>> If we cannot afford for  such kind of transparency  at our level we
>>> can't  ask ICANN to be more transparent  on its high level decision
>>>  either.
>>>
>>> Personally  I think, if  everyone knows the selections criteria and what
>>> vote/note/grade/mark was given by who (from EC) to who (candidate) the
>>> results would more straightforward and not subject to too much discussion.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> @__f_f__
>>> https://www.linkedin.com/in/farellf
>>> ________________________________
>>> Mail sent from my mobile phone. Excuse for brievety.
>>>
>>> Le 31 juil. 2017 9:47 AM, "Tapani Tarvainen" <ncuc at tapani.tarvainen.info>
>>> a écrit :
>>>
>>>> Dear all,
>>>>
>>>> While I'm happy to see two great candidates and good discussion
>>>> about NomCom, there's one side issue I find disconcerting, namely
>>>> how NCUC EC plans to make its decision.
>>>>
>>>> I may have misunderstood something, but looking at
>>>>
>>>> http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/2017-July/004061.html
>>>>
>>>> it seems they plan to discuss this in private emails.
>>>>
>>>> Transparency is one of our core values, moving EC deliberations to
>>>> private emails is something that should not be done lightly if at all,
>>>> certainly not without some extraordinary justification. I would very
>>>> much hate to see it become normal, routine procedure whenever EC or
>>>> the Chair feel like it.
>>>>
>>>> There may well be circumstances where confidential discussions are
>>>> needed, but they should be rare, explicitly justified and documented,
>>>> and even then they should still be recorded and records kept somewhere
>>>> where they can be accessed, e.g., by the Ombudsman if need be.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Tapani Tarvainen
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>>>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>>>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>>>
>>>
>>

-- 
*WISDOM DONKOR (S/N Eng.)*
E-government and Open Government Data Platforms Specialist
ICANN Fellow / Member, UN IGF MAG Member, ISOC Member,
Freedom Online Coalition (FOC) Member, Diplo Foundation Member,
OGP Open Data WG Member, GODAN Memember, ITAG Member
Email: wisdom.dk at gmail.com
Skype: wisdom_dk
facebook: facebook at wisdom_dk
Website: www.data.gov.gh
www.isoc.gh / www.itag.org.gh
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20170731/6a0a178e/attachment-0002.html>