[NCUC-DISCUSS] Nomcom

[Khouzeifi Issakha]

In my point of view both of them were better so we dont have to worry about
the result but let us give her time I think she Will do her best to work
hard.
Thank you

On Monday, 31 July 2017, Wisdom Donkor <wisdom.dk at gmail.com> wrote:

> I dont think there was any decision that was taken or hidden from any of
> the group.   What i see in this case is purely administrative processes.  I
> also dont think there was lack of transparency. Two person got nominated
> and the two will have to go through vetting in other for the best candidate
> to be  selected.
>
> What in my thinking mislead the whole process in my opinion was the +1's
> and all the supports thinking the candidates will have to go through voting.
>
> So, to say the was a hidden decision and lack of transparency in the
> process is here nor there.
>
>
> Cheers
>
>
>
>
> *WISDOM DONKOR (S/N Eng.)*
> E-government and Open Government Data Platforms Specialist
> ICANN Fellow / Member, UN IGF MAG Member, ISOC Member,
> Freedom Online Coalition (FOC) Member, Diplo Foundation Member,
> OGP Open Data WG Member, GODAN Memember, ITAG Member
> Email: wisdom.dk at gmail.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','wisdom.dk at gmail.com');>
> Skype: wisdom_dk
> facebook: facebook at wisdom_dk
> Website: www.data.gov.gh
> www.isoc.gh / www.itag.org.gh
>
> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 6:30 PM, Farell Folly <farellfolly at gmail.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','farellfolly at gmail.com');>> wrote:
>
>> I agree with Tapani on this point. There is no need to hide such kind of
>> decision to the rest of the group. If we (the group) had voted before to
>> conduct it  this way, that is fine, otherwise it is not fair for the
>> candidates or to the members to discover some rules or criteria once the
>> results are announced.
>>
>> If we cannot afford for  such kind of transparency  at our level we can't
>>  ask ICANN to be more transparent  on its high level decision  either.
>>
>> Personally  I think, if  everyone knows the selections criteria and what
>> vote/note/grade/mark was given by who (from EC) to who (candidate) the
>> results would more straightforward and not subject to too much discussion.
>>
>> Regards
>> @__f_f__
>> https://www.linkedin.com/in/farellf
>> ________________________________
>> Mail sent from my mobile phone. Excuse for brievety.
>>
>> Le 31 juil. 2017 9:47 AM, "Tapani Tarvainen" <ncuc at tapani.tarvainen.info
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ncuc at tapani.tarvainen.info');>> a écrit :
>>
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> While I'm happy to see two great candidates and good discussion
>>> about NomCom, there's one side issue I find disconcerting, namely
>>> how NCUC EC plans to make its decision.
>>>
>>> I may have misunderstood something, but looking at
>>>
>>> http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/2017-July/004061.html
>>>
>>> it seems they plan to discuss this in private emails.
>>>
>>> Transparency is one of our core values, moving EC deliberations to
>>> private emails is something that should not be done lightly if at all,
>>> certainly not without some extraordinary justification. I would very
>>> much hate to see it become normal, routine procedure whenever EC or
>>> the Chair feel like it.
>>>
>>> There may well be circumstances where confidential discussions are
>>> needed, but they should be rare, explicitly justified and documented,
>>> and even then they should still be recorded and records kept somewhere
>>> where they can be accessed, e.g., by the Ombudsman if need be.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Tapani Tarvainen
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org');>
>>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org');>
>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20170731/b4d482a8/attachment-0002.html>