[NCUC-DISCUSS] Nomcom

[Rafik Dammak]

Hi Anriette,

we are preparing for the first draft report, hopefully, to be submitted by
the end of next month to the CCWG plenary. We are in the middle working on
the recommendations and it doesn't seem a straightforward. if it passes the
readings, it can go to public comment. We only asked SO/AC including ICANN
staff and board via the questionnaire and so we didn't have input from
others than those involved in the subgroup.  I can understand the diversity
of political views but not sure to understand the diversity in approach and
analysis.

Best,

Rafik

2017-07-31 18:37 GMT+09:00 Anriette Esterhuysen <anriette at apc.org>:

> Thanks a lot Rafik. Interesting. And lots of NCUC people on the working
> group too!
>
> Two documents that are useful for those who are following this, both
> from April this year:
>
> 1. Most recent report of the working group:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1l2cGcx8nNvYSg_
> ZMUVnoC2t0VKb4ATQVTXxcxYILrXc/edit
>
> 2. Consolidated comments from SO/AC/groups in response to a
> questionnaire on diversity.
>
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1knHluhdwkxYvD8yfD4y1Gtgt-
> Ejd8AR8sqKqs5xkty4/edit#gid=1219217503
>
> The working group identified the following as elements of diversity in
> ICANN:
>
> Geographic/regional representation
> Language
> Gender
> Age
> Physical Disability
> Diverse Skills
> Stakeholder group or constituency
>
> I find it interesting that diversity in approach, political views and
> analysis is not reflected here.
>
> Anriette
>
>
> >
> > Le 31 juil. 2017 08:14, "Rafik Dammak" <rafik.dammak at gmail.com
> > <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>> a écrit :
> >
> >     Hi Anriette,
> >
> >
> >
> >         Has NCUC done its own analysis of diversity issues in ICANN? Are
> >         there
> >         other resources/studies that one can draw on that analyses
> "global
> >         North/South" participation, influence and power in ICANN? In this
> >         instance too I would like to understand the status quo better in
> >         order
> >         to assess what should be changed and how. And of course.. as I
> say
> >         above, Nomcom work is only one way of addressing the problem.
> >
> >
> >     there is ongoing diveristy subgroup related to CCWG to work on the
> >     issues of diverstty for participation and leadership as part of
> >     ICANN accountability work
> >     https://community.icann.org/display/WEIA/Diversity
> >     <https://community.icann.org/display/WEIA/Diversity>.
> >     AFNIC did a study last year and collected some data
> >     https://www.afnic.fr/en/about-afnic/news/general-news/9961/
> show/afnic-reveals-figures-on-diversity-within-icann-1.html
> >     <https://www.afnic.fr/en/about-afnic/news/general-news/
> 9961/show/afnic-reveals-figures-on-diversity-within-icann-1.html>.
> >       ICANN staff also collected some data. NCUC worked on bringing more
> >     people and organizations through its outreach efforts but I don't
> >     recall a specific analysis of diversity  which is a matter of
> >     resources and time.
> >
> >     Best,
> >
> >     Rafik
> >
> >
> >     _______________________________________________
> >     Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> >     Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org <mailto:Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>
> >     http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
> >     <http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss>
> >
>
> --
> ----------------------------------------
> Anriette Esterhuysen
> Director - global policy and strategy
> Association for Progressive Communications
> anriette at apc.org
> www.apc.org
> IM: ae_apc
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20170731/9441d16b/attachment-0002.html>