[NCUC-DISCUSS] The use of +1 's ... and why some people might be reluctant to post

[Olévié Kouami]

Greetings all,
@:Arsene : the SOI contents is the candidate responses to all eventual
question.
IMO.

Le 1 août 2017 07:09, "Arsène Tungali" <arsenebaguma at gmail.com> a écrit :

> That's the feeling i always had with regards to this point. I believe few
> ppl asked questions to candidates but not sure i saw anyone responded (i
> might have missed that).
>
> I suggest that would be the best way to use +1 on election periods!
>
> -----------------
> Arsène Tungali,
> about.me/ArseneTungali
> +243 993810967 <+243%20993%20810%20967>
> GPG: 523644A0
> Goma, Democratic Republic of Congo
>
> Sent from my iPhone (excuse typos)
>
> On Aug 1, 2017, at 1:36 AM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> hi,
>
> I understand that people want to express support someone by +1 for several
> personal reasons but it doesn't mean necessarily they are voting or
> endorsing the candidate explicitly. It is a practice that we had for many
> years but it doesn't replace a formal process like election or selection
> process like for nomcom, the charters are clear about those processes.
>
> Whatever for election or appointment, I strongly urge everyone to review
> the statement of interest made by the candidates, to ask them questions in
> the mailing list or the webinars so the candidate can indicate their
> thoughts and commitments. With that members can make an opinion about
> candidates without any influence or interference.
> That gives an idea about the expectations of the candidates from their
> membership but also indicate how much they know about the work to be done
> in the positions to be elected/appointed for.  That is also one of the
> effective ways to participate for members by carefully selecting and
> selecting representatives.
>
> Best,
>
> Rafik
>
> 2017-08-01 1:28 GMT+09:00 dorothy g <dgdorothydg at gmail.com>:
>
>> We need to distinguish between the use of plus 1 for agreement on a
>> discussion point and the use of plus 1 when people believe it will
>> influence a choice between candidates.
>> On the former I would agree with Ginger on the latter if my vote counts
>> give me a voting platform otherwise .....
>>
>> best
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 2:57 PM, Ginger Paque <virginiap at diplomacy.edu>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I just sent this message offlist to Sean, in reply to his comments:
>>>
>>> *Sean said:*
>>> Guys if am not mistaking, the email from the NCUC Chair suggests that a
>>> decision has been made by the EC on this matter.  ...  May I suggest
>>> the +1s be put to rest.
>>>
>>> *Ginger replied OFFLIST:*
>>> ...  I don't want to get involved in a discussion on the list, but I
>>> think the arguments in favor of +1, and the continued use of +1 tell us
>>> that it is a very important and useful tool. What's your objection? I'd
>>> rather see you contradicting the chair than discouraging the use of +1,
>>> especially for those who don't write well in English :)
>>>
>>> *Ginger (new)*
>>> I've decided now to use this as a clear example of another reason people
>>> lurk instead of engaging, and might prefer to use +1s. I also note that it
>>> is possible that Sean's comment was meant to be read between the lines.
>>>
>>> In the last year or so on several IG-related lists, posting a comment
>>> often elicits (not referring to the chair here in any way, shape, or form,
>>> just using the topic as an example) an antagonistic and/or aggressive
>>> response instead of discussion. I mention it here because it is relevant to
>>> the +1 issue. My English is decent, and I'm pretty outspoken myself, but I
>>> have to admit it has seriously affected my engagement.
>>>
>>> Happy (hopefully) IG discussions.
>>> Cheers, Ginger
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Virginia Paque
>>> DiploFoundation
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=icon> Virus-free.
>>> www.avast.com
>>> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=link>
>>> <#m_-2500580935377794526_m_-4248269335915716281_m_9141991994308763827_DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20170801/889656f2/attachment-0002.html>