[NCUC-DISCUSS] [Important] NCUC Bylaws amendment consultation process

[Zakir Syed]

+1. Plus it wold be a tough task to define who from among the members are active and who are not. 
Zakir

      From: Tapani Tarvainen <ncuc at tapani.tarvainen.info>
 To: ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org 
 Sent: Friday, September 9, 2016 11:51 AM
 Subject: Re: [NCUC-DISCUSS] [Important] NCUC Bylaws amendment consultation process
   
On Sep 09 08:45, Raoul Plommer (plommer at gmail.com) wrote:

> This might be completely off course, but should we have a way to kick out
> passive members, who haven't done anything for ... one or two years?

That is on the agenda of NCSG EC as part of creating procedures for
removing members in general. As any member removed from NCSG will
automatically be removed from its constituencies as well, it might
not be necessary for NCUC to have such a rule of its own.
Having a provision for that in the bylaws could still be useful,
but I'd rather avoid hardwiring it too tight there.

NCSG EC hasn't discussed this in any detail yet, but one or two years
would definitely be too short, 3-5 years might be realistic.

In any case such procedures would have to be approved by members,
so I expect to bring this to ncsg-discuss at some point.

--
Tapani Tarvainen
_______________________________________________
Ncuc-discuss mailing list
Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss


   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20160911/6e58a925/attachment-0002.html>