[NCUC-DISCUSS] [Important] NCUC Bylaws amendment consultation process

[Michael Oghia]

Sounds good Tapani, I appreciate this process and support it.

Best,
-Michael


On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 8:51 AM, Tapani Tarvainen <ncuc at tapani.tarvainen.info
> wrote:

> On Sep 09 08:45, Raoul Plommer (plommer at gmail.com) wrote:
>
> > This might be completely off course, but should we have a way to kick out
> > passive members, who haven't done anything for ... one or two years?
>
> That is on the agenda of NCSG EC as part of creating procedures for
> removing members in general. As any member removed from NCSG will
> automatically be removed from its constituencies as well, it might
> not be necessary for NCUC to have such a rule of its own.
> Having a provision for that in the bylaws could still be useful,
> but I'd rather avoid hardwiring it too tight there.
>
> NCSG EC hasn't discussed this in any detail yet, but one or two years
> would definitely be too short, 3-5 years might be realistic.
>
> In any case such procedures would have to be approved by members,
> so I expect to bring this to ncsg-discuss at some point.
>
> --
> Tapani Tarvainen
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20160909/eee8ab26/attachment-0002.html>