<html><head></head><body><div style="color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:HelveticaNeue-Light, Helvetica Neue Light, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif;font-size:13px">+1. Plus it wold be a tough task to define who from among the members are active and who are not. <br><div><span></span></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1473306259083_67395" class="qtdSeparateBR">Zakir<br><br></div><div style="display: block;" id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1473306259083_67388" class="yahoo_quoted"> <div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1473306259083_67387" style="font-family: HelveticaNeue-Light, Helvetica Neue Light, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"> <div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1473306259083_67386" style="font-family: HelveticaNeue, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;"> <div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1473306259083_67385" dir="ltr"> <font size="2" face="Arial"> <hr size="1"> <b><span style="font-weight:bold;">From:</span></b> Tapani Tarvainen <ncuc@tapani.tarvainen.info><br> <b><span style="font-weight: bold;">To:</span></b> ncuc-discuss@lists.ncuc.org <br> <b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Sent:</span></b> Friday, September 9, 2016 11:51 AM<br> <b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Subject:</span></b> Re: [NCUC-DISCUSS] [Important] NCUC Bylaws amendment consultation process<br> </font> </div> <div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1473306259083_67389" class="y_msg_container"><br>On Sep 09 08:45, Raoul Plommer (<a shape="rect" ymailto="mailto:plommer@gmail.com" href="mailto:plommer@gmail.com">plommer@gmail.com</a>) wrote:<br clear="none"><br clear="none">> This might be completely off course, but should we have a way to kick out<br clear="none">> passive members, who haven't done anything for ... one or two years?<br clear="none"><br clear="none">That is on the agenda of NCSG EC as part of creating procedures for<br clear="none">removing members in general. As any member removed from NCSG will<br clear="none">automatically be removed from its constituencies as well, it might<br clear="none">not be necessary for NCUC to have such a rule of its own.<br clear="none">Having a provision for that in the bylaws could still be useful,<br clear="none">but I'd rather avoid hardwiring it too tight there.<br clear="none"><br clear="none">NCSG EC hasn't discussed this in any detail yet, but one or two years<br clear="none">would definitely be too short, 3-5 years might be realistic.<br clear="none"><br clear="none">In any case such procedures would have to be approved by members,<br clear="none">so I expect to bring this to ncsg-discuss at some point.<br clear="none"><br clear="none">--<br clear="none">Tapani Tarvainen<div class="yqt0170270895" id="yqtfd87633"><br clear="none">_______________________________________________<br clear="none">Ncuc-discuss mailing list<br clear="none"><a shape="rect" ymailto="mailto:Ncuc-discuss@lists.ncuc.org" href="mailto:Ncuc-discuss@lists.ncuc.org">Ncuc-discuss@lists.ncuc.org</a><br clear="none"><a shape="rect" href="http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss" target="_blank">http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss</a><br clear="none"></div><br><br></div> </div> </div> </div></div></body></html>