[NCUC-DISCUSS] ICANN Community Anti-Harassment Policy: Summary of Discussion So Far
Rafik Dammak
rafik.dammak at gmail.com
Tue Nov 22 07:36:26 CET 2016
Hi Shane,
thanks for this effort to summarise the discussion, really helpful.
I think we can move those items to either google doc, etherpad and so on to
work on the statement and let people comment directly or proposing edits
there. definitely it is not early to start if we want to find a consensus
based text. if everyone is ok, I can create a google doc quickly .
Best,
Rafik
>
>
> 2016-11-22 14:15 GMT+09:00 Shane Kerr <shane at time-travellers.org>:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Apologies if I mis-characterize the discussion. It is not my intent to
>> pursue an agenda regarding the discussion here, but rather to try to
>> see where we are at and to make sure that the topic doesn't get dropped.
>>
>> It seems there are some areas of agreement regarding ICANN's proposed
>> anti-harassment policy, but also some areas of disagreement.
>>
>> Possible agreement:
>>
>> * The power of the ombudsperson in this process needs to be tempered
>> and/or changed.
>>
>> Probable disagreement:
>>
>> * Having a list of examples of harassment is a good idea.
>> * We should have a procedure for dealing with vexatious complaints.
>>
>> Unsure:
>>
>> * Privacy of everyone should be insured by the process.
>> * List of Specified Characteristic is unwieldy.
>> * Ongoing harassment should be addressed.
>> * Specific changes to the role of ombudsperson in the process. Perhaps a
>> separate, community (non-staff, non-board) position for this?
>>
>> I don't think that we can get consensus on the areas of disagreement.
>>
>> I would like to hope that we can get consensus on at least some of
>> those that I am unsure about.
>>
>> There may be other issues that have not come up yet, of course.
>>
>> Possibly we'll need to commit to having an NCUC response as well as
>> separate responses by people about issues of disagreement?
>>
>> Is it too early to start drafting text about what we do agree on?
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> --
>> Shane
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20161122/87e71a2d/attachment-0002.html>
More information about the Ncuc-discuss
mailing list