[NCUC-DISCUSS] Fwd: [ccwg-internet-governance] ICANN58 Block Schedule and High Interest Topic

[farzaneh badii]

Thanks. CCWG-IG Public session has normally been a panel  discussion to
tell people about Internet governance issues. I don't think for this
meeting we need that. We need a public session on what the ccwg-ig needs to
do and what it actually is. So the focus should be on ccwg-ig activities.

Of course if there are discussions on IG, I presume anyone could submit a
HIT or a discussion. Doesn't have to be ccwg-ig. I think we should stop
temporarily having panel discussions on IG issues ( for Copenhagen) get our
mandate and charter sorted and see what we want to focus on.



On 18 December 2016 at 02:53, William Drake <william.drake at uzh.ch> wrote:

> Hi
>
> Understood. The public IG session is a long time fixture on the meeting
> program and antedates the CCWIG which demanded to take it over from staff,
> and this is always additional to the working session. The only change last
> time was labeling the public session a HIT, which adds no particular
> value.  Or do you mean you object to the public session itself?
>
> Cheers
>
> Bill
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Dec 17, 2016, at 16:47, farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Thank you Bill
>
> I am the NCSG representative to that group and I would like to object to
> have a high interest session in Copenhagen.  We should bear in mind that we
> have to work on changing ccwg ig charter and make it more relevant. A HIT
> is only a one time session (which with a lot of good work of volunteers
> turned out to be great last meeting) and does not build up the ccwg ig. So
> I'm going to object and will inform ncsg about our future actions. I prefer
> to have a constructive working session. I see if I get support on that and
> revert to NCSG.
>
>
> On 17 Dec 2016 05:15, "William Drake" <william.drake at uzh.ch> wrote:
>
> I’m taking the liberty of forwarding a message Olivier sent to the CCW-IG,
> which is of relevance to prior discussions here of high interest topics etc.
>
> Bill
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> *From: *Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl at gih.com>
> *Subject: **[ccwg-internet-governance] ICANN58 Block Schedule and High
> Interest Topic*
> *Date: *December 17, 2016 at 10:42:53 GMT+1
> *To: *"internet >> ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org" <
> ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org>
>
> Hello all,
>
> the draft block schedule for ICANN 58 is out already. (see attached)
>
> Please see the information on the HITs from the last two ICANN Meetings
> below just received from Meetings staff.
>
>
>
> *ICANN56 (Policy Forum)  |  Helsinki*
>
> *Headcount*
>
> 1
>
> Cross-Community Session: Next Generation Registration Directory Services
>
> 215
>
> 2
>
> Cross-Community Session: New gTLD Subsequent Procedures
>
> 208
>
> 3
>
> Cross-Community Session: Review of All Rights Protection Mechanisms in All
> gTLDs
>
> 190
>
> 4
>
> Cross-Community Session: Country and Other Geographic Names Forum
>
> 182
>
> 5
>
> ICANN56 Wrap Up & Planning Ahead for ICANN57
>
> 149
>
> 6
>
> Cross-Community Session: Workload Scheduling and Management
>
> 109
>
> 7
>
> Cross-Community Session: Charter for the CCWG on Auction Proceeds
>
> 101
>
> 8
>
> Cross-Community Session: Draft Framework of Principles for Future CCWGs
>
> 65
>
>
>
>
> *ICANN57(AGM) |  Hyderabad*
>
> *Headcount*
>
> 1
>
> High Interest Topics session: Mitigation of Abuse in gTLDs
>
> 338
>
> 2
>
> Update on WHOIS-Related Initiatives
>
> 261
>
> 3
>
> DNS and Content Regulation  NCUC Group
>
> 197
>
> 4
>
> Exploring the Public Interest Within ICANN's Remit
>
> 190
>
> 5
>
> High Interest Topic session: Underserved Regions in ICANN
>
> 166
>
> 6
>
> Q&A with ICANN General Counsel on the legal advice that ICANN receives &
> how that supports the ICANN mission
>
> 132
>
> 7
>
> How to do outreach within each SO/AC
>
> 119
>
> 8
>
> Internet Governance Public Session
>
> 101
>
>
> You'll notice that our Internet Governance Public Session was the least
> attended session of the High Interest Topics. That said, it was late in the
> day, thus would have lost headcount.
>
> The deadline for Hit Interest Topic Session proposals is on Friday 23rd
> Dec 2016, so we need to file a request this week. Any suggestions?
>
> Kindest regards,
>
> Olivier
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ccwg-internet-governance mailing list
> ccwg-internet-governance at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance
>
>
> ************************************************
> William J. Drake
> International Fellow & Lecturer
>   Media Change & Innovation Division, IPMZ
>   University of Zurich, Switzerland
> william.drake at uzh.ch (direct), wjdrake at gmail.com (lists),
>   www.williamdrake.org
> ************************************************
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>
>
>


-- 
Farzaneh
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20161218/336d7b5e/attachment-0002.html>