[NCUC-DISCUSS] Revising the NCUC Bylaws

[Remmy Nweke]

Thanks Avri
I beginning to sense that some people are just relunctant about review this
bylaws and their reason, I am yet to know, but it behoves on all of us to
get it up and moreso the leadership of NCUC.
And I have asked the question where are we in the bylaw reworking and I
could get is a link of doodle, which for me is not an answer.
There was a guideline by Bill earlier, are we following it in dealing with
the assignment as finetuned?
I think we should be more of dealing or doing things with human face
(Humanity) if you like, than political inclination.
Best of the evening from here.
Remmy Nweke
@ITRealms

____
REMMY NWEKE,  Lead Strategist/Group Executive Editor,
DigitalSENSE Africa Media Ltd [*Multiple-award winning medium*]
(DigitalSENSE Business News
<http://www.digitalsenseafrica.com.ng/businessnews>; ITREALMS
<http://www.itrealms.com.ng>, NaijaAgroNet <http://www.naijaagronet.com.ng>)
Block F1, Shop 133 Moyosore Aboderin Plaza, Bolade Junction, Oshodi-Lagos
M: 234-8033592762, 8023122558, 8051000475, T: @ITRealms
<http://www.twitter.com/ITRealms>
Author: A Decade of ICT Reportage in Nigeria
<https://www.facebook.com/adecadeofictreportageinnigeria‎>
NDSF 2016
<https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10153112418861429&set=a.119216361428.104226.716351428&type=1>
_________________________________________________________________
*Confidentiality Notice:* The information in this document and attachments
are confidential and may also be privileged information. It is intended
only for the use of the named recipient. Remmy Nweke does not accept legal
responsibility for the contents of this e-mail. If you are not the intended
recipient, please notify me immediately, then delete this document and do
not disclose the contents of this document to any other person, nor make
any copies. Violators may face court persecution.

On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I think it will be years, if ever, before this structure is changed
> again.  A more fulsome overhaul of SOAC is required and that will be
> probably be post transition post Accountability WS2.
>
> At this point NCUC has a charter that does not meet the requirements of
> the NCSG it sits within.  The NCSG EC could, and should, take up a
> review of all constituencies as required by its charter.  Others, like
> the Board committee formerly known as SIC could take this up any time.
> And anyone else could make an issue of it, especially if they felt like
> harassing the NCUC as part of some other strategy.
>
> So I think it is wise to just do the cleanup on the charter.
>
> avri
>
> On 11-Sep-15 05:04, William Drake wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Thanks Marilia.  Actually I’d like to turn the question around ask you
> > and the other Councilors the same thing, as I don’t know what the
> > conversation there has been in any detail.  It’s not immediately
> > evident to me that Westlake recs by themselves necessarily have all
> > that much bearing on this effort; indeed the lack of attention to
> > structural issues was a concern discussed at the NCPH meeting in DC.
> >  Whether the larger process about a possible Membership structure
> > could affect anything is another question I can’t answer…this is why I
> > was suggesting to take this slow, but there were people who said it
> > needed to be done pronto, so here we are.
> >
> > Bill
> >
> >
> >> On Sep 11, 2015, at 12:34 AM, Marilia Maciel <mariliamaciel at gmail.com
> >> <mailto:mariliamaciel at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I have just subscribed to the list. However, I would like to ask
> >> those who are much more knowledgeable than me for some clarity. How
> >> much the discussions in the GNSO review process may impact how the SG
> >> operates and, in turn, how NCUC operates? Is there anything coming
> >> down that pipe we should defensively prepare for and use the bylaws
> >> discussion to do it? Bill's initial position to wait seemed
> >> reasonable to me, so I just would like to understand how we can use
> >> this bylaws discussion to strengthen NCUC in the midst of this
> >> review, instead of giving the feeling of a "building under
> >> construction". I think we can, or people would not be suggesting it
> >> now... Maybe this is a good piece to share with "younger" folks.
> >>
> >> Thanks and best
> >> Marília
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 9:08 AM, Arun Mohan Sukumar
> >> <arunmohan.s at gmail.com <mailto:arunmohan.s at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >>
> >>     Hi Remmy,
> >>
> >>     Here's where we are on the Bylaws
> >>     list:
> http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/bylaws/2015-September/000067.html
> >>
> >>     NCUC-ers, please sign up for the Bylaws list if you'vent already!
> >>
> >>     Best,
> >>     Arun
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> > Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> > http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20150911/c243e45f/attachment-0002.html>