[NCUC-DISCUSS] Revising the NCUC Bylaws

[Avri Doria]

Hi,

I think it will be years, if ever, before this structure is changed
again.  A more fulsome overhaul of SOAC is required and that will be
probably be post transition post Accountability WS2.

At this point NCUC has a charter that does not meet the requirements of
the NCSG it sits within.  The NCSG EC could, and should, take up a
review of all constituencies as required by its charter.  Others, like
the Board committee formerly known as SIC could take this up any time. 
And anyone else could make an issue of it, especially if they felt like
harassing the NCUC as part of some other strategy.

So I think it is wise to just do the cleanup on the charter.

avri

On 11-Sep-15 05:04, William Drake wrote:
> Hi
>
> Thanks Marilia.  Actually I’d like to turn the question around ask you
> and the other Councilors the same thing, as I don’t know what the
> conversation there has been in any detail.  It’s not immediately
> evident to me that Westlake recs by themselves necessarily have all
> that much bearing on this effort; indeed the lack of attention to
> structural issues was a concern discussed at the NCPH meeting in DC.
>  Whether the larger process about a possible Membership structure
> could affect anything is another question I can’t answer…this is why I
> was suggesting to take this slow, but there were people who said it
> needed to be done pronto, so here we are.
>
> Bill
>
>
>> On Sep 11, 2015, at 12:34 AM, Marilia Maciel <mariliamaciel at gmail.com
>> <mailto:mariliamaciel at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have just subscribed to the list. However, I would like to ask
>> those who are much more knowledgeable than me for some clarity. How
>> much the discussions in the GNSO review process may impact how the SG
>> operates and, in turn, how NCUC operates? Is there anything coming
>> down that pipe we should defensively prepare for and use the bylaws
>> discussion to do it? Bill's initial position to wait seemed
>> reasonable to me, so I just would like to understand how we can use
>> this bylaws discussion to strengthen NCUC in the midst of this
>> review, instead of giving the feeling of a "building under
>> construction". I think we can, or people would not be suggesting it
>> now... Maybe this is a good piece to share with "younger" folks.
>>
>> Thanks and best
>> Marília
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 9:08 AM, Arun Mohan Sukumar
>> <arunmohan.s at gmail.com <mailto:arunmohan.s at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     Hi Remmy,
>>
>>     Here's where we are on the Bylaws
>>     list: http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/bylaws/2015-September/000067.html
>>
>>     NCUC-ers, please sign up for the Bylaws list if you'vent already!
>>
>>     Best,
>>     Arun
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus