[NCUC-DISCUSS] What would "good" look like to you for ICANN in 2015?

[Robin Gross]

Great list!

Thanks,
Robin

On Jan 27, 2015, at 1:30 AM, William Drake wrote:

> Hi
> 
> Thanks everyone for the input. He asked for three points, based on your replies I’ll give him transparency/inclusive decision making at the organizational/community interface both intra-ICANN and externally (e.g. NMI), internationally accepted human rights (esp. FoE and privacy) standards mainstreamed into decision making criteria, and a stronger focus on concerns of users not just the ‘domain name industry.’  
> 
> Bill
> 
>> On Jan 27, 2015, at 8:48 AM, Joy Liddicoat <joy at liddicoatlaw.co.nz> wrote:
>> 
>> +1
>> Joy
>>  
>> From: ncuc-discuss-bounces at lists.ncuc.org [mailto:ncuc-discuss-bounces at lists.ncuc.org] On Behalf Of Robin Gross
>> Sent: Monday, 26 January 2015 1:58 p.m.
>> To: NCUC-discuss
>> Subject: Re: [NCUC-DISCUSS] What would "good" look like to you for ICANN in 2015?
>>  
>> Yes, please.  Thanks! - Robin
>>  
>>  
>> On Jan 24, 2015, at 11:36 AM, Kathy Kleiman wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> Hi Bill,
>> I think you should include that "good" for ICANN in 2015 would involve inclusion of Human Rights into the analysis of policy and issues in which ICANN is involved.
>> Best,
>> Kathy:
>>> Hi 
>>>  
>>> Make of this what you will.  Any thoughts I could convey on behalf of NCUC?
>>>  
>>> Bill
>>>  
>>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>>>  
>>>> From: Fadi Chehade <fadi.chehade at icann.org>
>>>> Subject: What would "good" look like to you for ICANN in 2015?
>>>> Date: January 24, 2015 at 3:07:54 AM GMT+1
>>>>  
>>>> Dear SO, AC and SG Leadership,
>>>>  
>>>> I write to follow up on last week’s call.
>>>>  
>>>> As I hope you remember, I asked for a small favor, that you send me an email sharing three items, three bullet points or fewer which outline from your perspective what “good” would look like for ICANN by the end of 2015.  I’m not looking for specific projects or initiatives necessarily.  If we take a step back from our work together and consider what “good” might look like, I would very much appreciate hearing from you all and learning what you would consider that to be.  Even if you wish to share only one or two items, it is important that I collect your feedback alongside that of the Board members and our global leaders so I may assemble a greater picture of “good” to share in Singapore when we all meet together.
>>>>  
>>>> Thank you all.  I look forward to hearing from you and welcome return responses from those who have already shared their thoughts with me.
>>>>  
>>>> Best,
>>>> Fadi
>>>>  
>>>>  
>>>> Fadi Chehadé
>>>> President & CEO ICANN
>>>> +1.310.578.8690
>>>>  
>>>>  
>>>> Sr. Manager, CEO Office:
>>>> Cassia Oliveira
>>>> cassia.oliveira at icann.org
>>>> +1.310.578.8656
>>>> <Mail Attachment.png>
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>>  
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>>  
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
> 
> ***********************************************
> William J. Drake
> International Fellow & Lecturer
>   Media Change & Innovation Division, IPMZ
>   University of Zurich, Switzerland
> Chair, Noncommercial Users Constituency, 
>   ICANN, www.ncuc.org
> william.drake at uzh.ch (direct), wjdrake at gmail.com (lists),
>   www.williamdrake.org
> ***********************************************
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20150128/5f43bb63/attachment-0002.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 496 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20150128/5f43bb63/attachment.sig>