[NCUC-DISCUSS] NCUC Survey Results Analysis - Part I
Edward Morris
egmorris1 at toast.net
Fri Apr 24 12:57:33 CEST 2015
Agreed Seun.
One of our EC members, for example, can't access Google documents and in the past that has hampered his ability to participate in working groups. I think we need to consciously avoid specific platforms in all cases that might have this problem. Perhaps ICANN needs to invest in a higher quality or easier to use proprietary work space than we have now.
Ed
Sent from my iPad
> On Apr 24, 2015, at 11:27 AM, Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Edward, all
>
> While i am not disputing restrictions mentioned, i just like to point out that it could also be one of the reasons for low turn out when the form was administered. If it wasn't a reason then accessing the result now won't be a restriction.
>
> Regards
>
>> On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 12:48 AM, Edward Morris <egmorris1 at toast.net> wrote:
>> Hi Walid,
>>
>> The results seem extremely interesting and I look forward to digesting the them in their entirety. Thank you so much for your hard work!
>>
>> A request: Is it possible to ensure that the results eventually become available on a non-Google platform? Some of our members live in countries where Google is heavily censored and they are unable to access Google docs and Google drive. Perhaps we can get it up on the NCUC website.
>>
>> Thanks for considering,
>>
>> Ed
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> > On Apr 23, 2015, at 11:47 PM, Walid AL-SAQAF <wsaqaf at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Dear colleagues,
>> >
>> > I have managed to convert the survey results to SPSS data files and
>> > started doing some regression analysis on 70+ variables. It looks like
>> > there will be some interesting results.
>> >
>> > Instead of just having you wait until I do the full analysis, I
>> > decided to transfer the results in chunks to help us discuss the
>> > various findings and hopefully build up the momentum towards the end
>> > where the most important questions will be addressed.
>> >
>> > I'll spend the next days and weeks to do multivariate analysis and
>> > aggregations and see if any significant correlations or other patterns
>> > emerge, which in turn could help us see where NCUC needs work and how
>> > to go about doing it.
>> >
>> > Today, I'm sending a simple analysis of the level of participation in
>> > the survey. I only analyzed the following three variables so far:
>> > 1) Level of anonymity (derived from the name/email fields)
>> > 2) Years in NCUC
>> > 3) Date when the survey was filled
>> >
>> > You can access the first part of the analysis here:
>> > https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6mAtpcLlTBBRkVVdnlBNVYtNGM/view
>> >
>> > I'll be sending the second analysis report when I'm done in a few
>> > days. Let me know if you have questions to answer or ideas that I
>> > could use.
>> >
>> > Sincerely,
>> >
>> > Walid
>> >
>> > -----------------
>> >
>> > Walid Al-Saqaf, PhD
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>> > Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>> > http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>
>
>
> --
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Seun Ojedeji,
> Federal University Oye-Ekiti
> web: http://www.fuoye.edu.ng
> Mobile: +2348035233535
> alt email: seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng
>
> The key to understanding is humility - my view !
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20150424/17823a41/attachment-0002.html>
More information about the Ncuc-discuss
mailing list