NCUC members only - Voters' list verification of addresses

[Joly MacFie]

Yes, essentially what I was saying. I was comparing the one vote ALS's to
the 2 vote Orgs, but I guess 2 votes would actually count as one, if the
individuals just constituted a single org. Same difference. I had forgotten
about the exclusionary rule.

I don't see any example of abuse within the NCUC, the problem is more
getting people to vote at all, but the possibility is there for an org to
pad the NCUC wth individuals to bolster a position.

j




On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 10:59 PM, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> As I understand NARALO, someone who is a member of an ALS cannot also be
> an individual member.
> Another difference is that all individual members together only count as a
> single ALS with its 1 vote, so it is not at all like having 2 votes.
>
> avri
>
> On 27 Apr 2012, at 22:41, Joly MacFie wrote:
>
> > What I know is that, in the case of At-Large, only NARALO allows
> individual members and, in that case, it is so structured that the
> individual members collectively are construed as an equivalent structure to
> any other and thus, in this case, would only merit two votes between the
> lot of them.
> >
> > j
> > --
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------
> > Joly MacFie  218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast
> > WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com
> >  http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com
> >  VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org
> > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > -
>



--
---------------------------------------------------------------
Joly MacFie  218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast
WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com
 http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com
 VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org
--------------------------------------------------------------
-
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20120428/6db43de6/attachment-0001.html>