IGF and us

[Baudouin SCHOMBE]

Hi Carlos,

I thing to be in Nairobi for IGF 2011


SCHOMBE BAUDOUIN





2011/7/4 Carlos A. Afonso <ca at cafonso.ca>

> Carissimi,
>
> The IGF is approaching. Whatever our views on it, some of us will be
> there in some capacity (mostly in the workshops, I guess). Could we
> think of something among us as NCUC/NCSG taking advantage of being there
> -- maybe some face-to-face agenda regarding the ICANN process pre-Senegal?
>
> First of, we would need to know who will be there.
>
> []s fraternos
>
> --c.a.
>
> On 07/03/2011 07:57 PM, Nicolas Adam wrote:
> > Thank you both.
> >
> > I agree that we should keep our propositions for the Review, but i was
> > glad to be able to read some of them in advance.
> >
> > Nicolas
> >
> > On 7/3/2011 10:40 AM, Milton L Mueller wrote:
> >> KK:
> >> Thanks for making the comments better. However, on the issue of
> >> proposing specific substantive and procedural changes, I think it
> >> would be a tactical mistake to do so in this round of comments. I
> >> think the main issue now is whether the review takes place at all. We
> >> should not, in my opinion, let other groups know what we would
> >> consider acceptable changes until we are actually in a review.
> >>
> >> You will recall that in Singapore we agreed to work on a reference
> >> document regarding what changes would be ideal from our point of view.
> >> I still believe that work should proceed on that document, but it
> >> should not be confused with the comments on the need for a review, imho.
> >>
> >> --MM
> >>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Konstantinos Komaitis [mailto:k.komaitis at strath.ac.uk]
> >>> Sent: Sunday, July 03, 2011 6:48 AM
> >>> To: Milton L Mueller; NCSG-NCUC-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
> >>> Subject: Re: proposed comments on UDRP
> >>> Importance: High
> >>>
> >>> I am sending a draft with my additions on the substantive and
> procedural
> >>> changes we would like to see in the UDRP. Apologies if I went a bit
> >>> overboard here, but as you may many of these issues are covered in my
> >>> book - so I tried to include them without being academically pedantic.
> >>>
> >>> May I suggest we use this document as our master copy and I have also
> >>> uploaded it in a piratepad version (http://piratepad.net/sNv8ukSm1V)
> for
> >>> those who do use open source software.
> >>>
> >>> The deadline for submission is July 15 and I can submit them. May I,
> >>> therefore, have all your suggestions/recommendations no later than July
> >>> 14, 2011.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>>
> >>> KK
> >>>
> >>> From: Milton L Mueller<mueller at SYR.EDU<mailto:mueller at SYR.EDU>>
> >>> Reply-To: Milton L Mueller<mueller at SYR.EDU<mailto:mueller at SYR.EDU>>
> >>> Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 11:30:01 +0100
> >>> To: "NCSG-NCUC-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU<mailto:NCSG-NCUC-
> >>> DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU>"<NCSG-NCUC-
> >>> DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU<mailto:NCSG-NCUC-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU>>
> >>> Subject: proposed comments on UDRP
> >>>
> >>> Please consider the attached document my contribution to the effort. It
> >>> gets us started. I do not have time to do much more, so I hope others
> >>> can finish it.
> >>>
> >>> Milton L. Mueller
> >>> Professor, Syracuse University School of Information Studies Internet
> >>> Governance Project http://blog.internetgovernance.org
> >>>
> >>>
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20110704/e765176d/attachment-0001.html>