IGF and us

[Carlos A. Afonso]

Carissimi,

The IGF is approaching. Whatever our views on it, some of us will be
there in some capacity (mostly in the workshops, I guess). Could we
think of something among us as NCUC/NCSG taking advantage of being there
-- maybe some face-to-face agenda regarding the ICANN process pre-Senegal?

First of, we would need to know who will be there.

[]s fraternos

--c.a.

On 07/03/2011 07:57 PM, Nicolas Adam wrote:
> Thank you both.
>
> I agree that we should keep our propositions for the Review, but i was
> glad to be able to read some of them in advance.
>
> Nicolas
>
> On 7/3/2011 10:40 AM, Milton L Mueller wrote:
>> KK:
>> Thanks for making the comments better. However, on the issue of
>> proposing specific substantive and procedural changes, I think it
>> would be a tactical mistake to do so in this round of comments. I
>> think the main issue now is whether the review takes place at all. We
>> should not, in my opinion, let other groups know what we would
>> consider acceptable changes until we are actually in a review.
>>
>> You will recall that in Singapore we agreed to work on a reference
>> document regarding what changes would be ideal from our point of view.
>> I still believe that work should proceed on that document, but it
>> should not be confused with the comments on the need for a review, imho.
>>
>> --MM
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Konstantinos Komaitis [mailto:k.komaitis at strath.ac.uk]
>>> Sent: Sunday, July 03, 2011 6:48 AM
>>> To: Milton L Mueller; NCSG-NCUC-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
>>> Subject: Re: proposed comments on UDRP
>>> Importance: High
>>>
>>> I am sending a draft with my additions on the substantive and procedural
>>> changes we would like to see in the UDRP. Apologies if I went a bit
>>> overboard here, but as you may many of these issues are covered in my
>>> book - so I tried to include them without being academically pedantic.
>>>
>>> May I suggest we use this document as our master copy and I have also
>>> uploaded it in a piratepad version (http://piratepad.net/sNv8ukSm1V) for
>>> those who do use open source software.
>>>
>>> The deadline for submission is July 15 and I can submit them. May I,
>>> therefore, have all your suggestions/recommendations no later than July
>>> 14, 2011.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> KK
>>>
>>> From: Milton L Mueller<mueller at SYR.EDU<mailto:mueller at SYR.EDU>>
>>> Reply-To: Milton L Mueller<mueller at SYR.EDU<mailto:mueller at SYR.EDU>>
>>> Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 11:30:01 +0100
>>> To: "NCSG-NCUC-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU<mailto:NCSG-NCUC-
>>> DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU>"<NCSG-NCUC-
>>> DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU<mailto:NCSG-NCUC-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU>>
>>> Subject: proposed comments on UDRP
>>>
>>> Please consider the attached document my contribution to the effort. It
>>> gets us started. I do not have time to do much more, so I hope others
>>> can finish it.
>>>
>>> Milton L. Mueller
>>> Professor, Syracuse University School of Information Studies Internet
>>> Governance Project http://blog.internetgovernance.org
>>>
>>>
>