Petition to form a new ICANN constituency

[Nuno Garcia]

Following Konstantinos concerns, and not discussing anyone's rights to
present a new constituency, I find disturbing the notion that a new
constituency is needed to further specify the needs of not-for-profit users,
as opposed to the non-commercial users. I clearly see not-for-profit
organizations as a subset of the non-commercial user group.

Assuming this, and having in view the proposal Amber forwarded (for which I
am truly gratefull), my question for Amber is different:

- in what measure do you feel the NCUC does not represent the needs and
aspirations of not-for-profit organizations?
- is there any less clear advantage by having two constituencies that have a
lot in common?

BR

NG

On 2 November 2010 16:13, Ginger Paque <gpaque at gmail.com> wrote:

>  Hi Amber and all...
> I have the same concerns as Konstantinos. Thanks for expressing them
> clearly KK.
> gp
>
> *
> **Ginger (Virginia) Paque
> *IGCBP Online Coordinator
> DiploFoundation
> www.diplomacy.edu/ig
>
> *The latest from Diplo...*
> http://igbook.diplomacy.edu is the online companion to *An Introduction to
> Internet Governance, *Diplo's publication on IG. Download the book, read
> the blogs and post your comments.
>
> On 11/2/2010 11:37 AM, Konstantinos Komaitis wrote:
>
> Dear Amber,
>
> Thanks for keeping us informed and for sending this. However, I certainly feel quite confused with the statement and purpose of this new constituency. In your letter, you submit to the suggestion that up until today non-for-profit and non-governmental organisation have been unrepresented in ICANN. "We believe creating a new constituency focused the operational impact of ICANN policies on the service delivery of not-for-profit and non-governmental organizations will be an important addition to the ICANN community."
> Personally as a member of NCUC over the past five years, I would like to say that this is not accurate. A quick look at NCUC's membership roster demonstrates that there are many non-for-profit and non-governmental organisations both within and outside the US that have joined NCUC.
> So I would like to clarify that the types of organisations you are suggesting as an important addition to the ICANN community, are already part of that community and have successfully and fairly been represented through the NCUC.
>
> Thanks
>
> KK
>
> Dr. Konstantinos Komaitis,
>
> Law Lecturer,
> Director of Postgraduate Instructional Courses
> Director of LLM Information Technology and Telecommunications Law
> University of Strathclyde,
> The Law School,
> Graham Hills building,
> 50 George Street, Glasgow G1 1BA
> UK
> tel: +44 (0)141 548 4306http://www.routledgemedia.com/books/The-Current-State-of-Domain-Name-Regulation-isbn9780415477765
> Selected publications: http://hq.ssrn.com/submissions/MyPapers.cfm?partid=501038
> Website: www.komaitis.org
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: NCSG-NCUC [mailto:NCSG-NCUC-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU <NCSG-NCUC-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU>] On Behalf Of "Kleinwachter, Wolfgang"
> Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 3:31 PM
> To: NCSG-NCUC-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
> Subject: AW: Petition to form a new ICANN constituency
>
> Dear Amber
>
> In your letter your write: "As one of its major initiatives, the NPOC has placed a priority on ongoing global outreach activities, especially to communities and regions currently under-represented in ICANN. We are pleased that several organizations have already indicated an interest in the NPOC during this pendency period; however, many more are waiting for the NPOC to be officially recognized before joining."
>
> Would it be possible to provide a list of such waiting organisations? And would it be also possible to specifiy your outreach  activities in currently under-represented regions. I am in particular interested what you have done in Eastern Europa, Central Asia and Eastern and Western Africa.
>
> Thanks
>
> wolfgang
>
> ________________________________
>
> Von: Amber Sterling [mailto:asterling at AAMC.ORG <asterling at AAMC.ORG>]
> Gesendet: Di 02.11.2010 15:36
> An: NCSG-NCUC-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
> Betreff: FW: Petition to form a new ICANN constituency
>
>
>
> The NPOC formation committee has formally submitted its charter petition to the Board (attached).
>
>
>
> Amber Sterling
>
> Senior Intellectual Property Specialist
>
> Association of American Medical Colleges
>
>
>
> From: npoc
> Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 10:30 AM
> To: 'new-constituency at icann.org'
> Cc: 'George Sadowsky'
> Subject: Petition to form a new ICANN constituency
>
>
>
> Dear Mr. Dengate-Thrush and the ICANN Board of Directors,
>
>
>
> The formation committee and organizations supporting the Not-for-Profit Organizations Constituency (NPOC) are pleased to submit the attached cover letter and new constituency petition.  We respectfully request your prompt consideration as we are eager to participate in the ICANN community as a recognized entity.  Please contact us at npoc at aamc.org if you have any questions or require additional information.
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
> Amber
>
>
>
> Amber Sterling
>
> Senior Intellectual Property Specialist
>
> Association of American Medical Colleges
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20101102/19f496f8/attachment-0001.html>