[council] FW: Proposal to form a Joint ALAC - GNSO WG "to develop a sustainable approach to providing support to applicants requiring assistance in applying for and operating new gTLDs" in response to the ICANN Board Resolution 20 at the Nairobi

[Rafik Dammak]

Dear Jorge,

it is just one idea among others, nobody can determine the outcome of
working group. the wg members will discuss what they want to do :)

Rafik

2010/3/21 Jorge Amodio <jmamodio at gmail.com>

> > within NCSG/NCUC the discussion was more about pricing and to prove that
> is
> > feasible and possible to run a registry fairly reaching all requirements
> in
> > cheap way than expected by ICANN. that is why we want to learn from ccTLD
> > experience.
>
> If you are already defining what the outcome/goal of the working group
> has to be, there is no reason for a working group.
>
> I thought the idea was to put together an exercise to determine
> regardless of what ICANN says or other expect, an overall idea of what
> it takes in terms of costs to run a registry, there may be different
> scenarios, like DIY or outsource, many documented assumptions and
> variables.
>
> But if the idea is just to find proof that what somebody said was
> incorrect or not very well founded there is no reason to waste time
> forming a working group.
>
> Just MHO.
>
> Regards
> Jorge
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20100321/340ee9a0/attachment.html>