[council] FW: Proposal to form a Joint ALAC - GNSO WG "to develop a sustainable approach to providing support to applicants requiring assistance in applying for and operating new gTLDs" in response to the ICANN Board Resolution 20 at the Nairobi
Rafik Dammak
rafik.dammak at GMAIL.COM
Sat Mar 20 18:39:50 CET 2010
Dear Jorge,
it is just one idea among others, nobody can determine the outcome of
working group. the wg members will discuss what they want to do :)
Rafik
2010/3/21 Jorge Amodio <jmamodio at gmail.com>
> > within NCSG/NCUC the discussion was more about pricing and to prove that
> is
> > feasible and possible to run a registry fairly reaching all requirements
> in
> > cheap way than expected by ICANN. that is why we want to learn from ccTLD
> > experience.
>
> If you are already defining what the outcome/goal of the working group
> has to be, there is no reason for a working group.
>
> I thought the idea was to put together an exercise to determine
> regardless of what ICANN says or other expect, an overall idea of what
> it takes in terms of costs to run a registry, there may be different
> scenarios, like DIY or outsource, many documented assumptions and
> variables.
>
> But if the idea is just to find proof that what somebody said was
> incorrect or not very well founded there is no reason to waste time
> forming a working group.
>
> Just MHO.
>
> Regards
> Jorge
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20100321/0d96a3f6/attachment.html>
More information about the Ncuc-discuss
mailing list