[ncsg-policy] Re: Comment periods / DAG4

[Alex Gakuru]

I agree and request for leadership on it.

On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 5:32 PM, Wendy Seltzer <wendy at seltzer.com> wrote:

> NCSG and NCSG-Policy:
>
> Could we please compile a list of the comments members have submitted on
> DAG4 for which we might seek Stakeholder Group endorsement, and then take
> whatever steps necessary to determine whether to endorse them?  I believe
> that such endorsement would be accepted even though the comment period has
> closed.
>
> I know Konstantinos, Mary, Robin, Avri, Debbie, and I have submitted
> comments, and I'm sure others have as well.  I have not reviewed the full
> list, and do not know whether all authors would seek SG endorsement.  How
> should we proceed?
>
> Thanks,
> --Wendy
>
> On 07/21/2010 03:16 PM, Mary Wong wrote:
>
>> Likewise (it's now 3.15 a.m. in Singapore :) and I apologize once again
>> for not
>> having been able to circulate my draft comments before today.
>> I support Wendy's and Avri's earlier suggestion for each of us to send in
>> the
>> comments individually.
>> I also encourage NCSG and NCUC members to log on to
>> http://forum.icann.org/lists/4gtld-guide/ to endorse comments with which
>> they
>> agree. At the moment, Wendy, my and Konstantinos' comments are already up.
>> Thanks,
>> Mary
>> *Mary W S Wong*
>> Professor of Law&  Chair, Graduate IP Programs
>> Franklin Pierce Law Center
>> Two White Street
>> Concord, NH 03301
>> USA
>> Email: mwong at piercelaw.edu<mailto:mwong at piercelaw.edu>
>> Phone: 1-603-513-5143
>> Webpage: http://www.piercelaw.edu/marywong/index.php
>> Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN)
>> at:
>> http://ssrn.com/author=437584
>>
>>  >>>
>> *From: *        Konstantinos Komaitis<k.komaitis at STRATH.AC.UK>
>> *To:*   <NCSG-NCUC-DISCUSS at listserv.syr.edu>
>> *Date: *        7/21/2010 1:16 PM
>> *Subject: *     Re: Comment periods
>>
>> It is pretty late here and I don't have time to compile the comments
>> myself.
>> However, please use them as part of NCUC's submission. I will be also
>> submitting
>> these in my own capacity.
>>
>> KK
>>
>>
>> On 21/07/2010 17:59, "Robin Gross"<robin at ipjustice.org>  wrote:
>>
>> I haven't written anything myself and was hoping to provide comments and
>> sign-on
>> to a group statement.
>>
>> If there isn't enough time to get NCSG support for a consolidated set of
>> comments, we can probably get NCUC support and submit them as such.
>>
>> Perhaps what we need at this point is for KK, Mary,&  Wendy's comments to
>> be
>> consolidated into a single statement the group can support (either NCUC or
>> NCSG).
>>
>> Anyone want to take a stab at consolidation of the various parts in the
>> next few
>> hours?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Robin
>>
>>
>>
>> On Jul 21, 2010, at 8:26 AM, Avri Doria wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Well we certainly don't have time for a vote, and this does fall under
>> their
>> responsibility for a NCSG statement as defined in the charter we approved.
>>
>>
>> Discussion and development of substantive policies and statements issued
>> in the
>> name of the NCSG. This activity will require coordination with the
>> membership
>> and the Interest-Groups;
>>
>>
>>
>> Of course the constituency and candidate constituency/interest-groups can
>> also
>> submit one under their names according to their various procedures.
>>
>> And the individuals can submit, under their names and the names of their
>> organizations.
>>
>> a.
>>
>> On 21 Jul 2010, at 11:18, Wendy Seltzer wrote:
>>
>>
>> Thanks Avri.
>>
>> Group, what procedures do we want to follow for submitting comments,
>> especially
>> for those due today on DAG4 (where we have several distinct segments)?
>> Should we
>> each submit what we've written individually, and follow up with NCSG
>> endorsement
>> if the policy council approves? (as Avri suggested in response to another
>> thread)
>>
>> --Wendy
>>
>> On 07/21/2010 11:08 AM, Avri Doria wrote:
>>
>> hi,
>>
>> just did a quick update of the comment list on the wiki
>>
>> https://st.icann.org/ncsg-ec/index.cgi?comment_periods_and_volunteers
>>
>> noticed a lot of things were ending today. tough there have been a few
>> extensions in general.
>>
>>
>> a.
>>
>>
>>
>> Pierce Law | University of New Hampshire - An Innovative Partnership
>> <http://www.piercelaw.edu/>
>>
> --
> Wendy Seltzer -- wendy at seltzer.org
> Fellow, Silicon Flatirons Center at University of Colorado Law School
> Fellow, Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University
> http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/seltzer.html
> http://www.chillingeffects.org/
> https://www.torproject.org/
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20100722/cba19fc6/attachment.html>