I agree and request for leadership on it.<div><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 5:32 PM, Wendy Seltzer <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:wendy@seltzer.com">wendy@seltzer.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
NCSG and NCSG-Policy:<br>
<br>
Could we please compile a list of the comments members have submitted on DAG4 for which we might seek Stakeholder Group endorsement, and then take whatever steps necessary to determine whether to endorse them? I believe that such endorsement would be accepted even though the comment period has closed.<br>
<br>
I know Konstantinos, Mary, Robin, Avri, Debbie, and I have submitted comments, and I'm sure others have as well. I have not reviewed the full list, and do not know whether all authors would seek SG endorsement. How should we proceed?<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
--Wendy<br>
<br>
On 07/21/2010 03:16 PM, Mary Wong wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Likewise (it's now 3.15 a.m. in Singapore :) and I apologize once again for not<br>
having been able to circulate my draft comments before today.<br>
I support Wendy's and Avri's earlier suggestion for each of us to send in the<br>
comments individually.<br>
I also encourage NCSG and NCUC members to log on to<br>
<a href="http://forum.icann.org/lists/4gtld-guide/" target="_blank">http://forum.icann.org/lists/4gtld-guide/</a> to endorse comments with which they<br>
agree. At the moment, Wendy, my and Konstantinos' comments are already up.<br>
Thanks,<br>
Mary<br>
*Mary W S Wong*<br>
Professor of Law& Chair, Graduate IP Programs<br>
Franklin Pierce Law Center<br>
Two White Street<br>
Concord, NH 03301<br>
USA<br>
Email: <a href="mailto:mwong@piercelaw.edu" target="_blank">mwong@piercelaw.edu</a><mailto:<a href="mailto:mwong@piercelaw.edu" target="_blank">mwong@piercelaw.edu</a>><br>
Phone: 1-603-513-5143<br>
Webpage: <a href="http://www.piercelaw.edu/marywong/index.php" target="_blank">http://www.piercelaw.edu/marywong/index.php</a><br>
Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at:<br>
<a href="http://ssrn.com/author=437584" target="_blank">http://ssrn.com/author=437584</a><br>
<br>
>>><br>
*From: * Konstantinos Komaitis<<a href="mailto:k.komaitis@STRATH.AC.UK" target="_blank">k.komaitis@STRATH.AC.UK</a>><br>
*To:* <<a href="mailto:NCSG-NCUC-DISCUSS@listserv.syr.edu" target="_blank">NCSG-NCUC-DISCUSS@listserv.syr.edu</a>><br>
*Date: * 7/21/2010 1:16 PM<br>
*Subject: * Re: Comment periods<br>
<br>
It is pretty late here and I don't have time to compile the comments myself.<br>
However, please use them as part of NCUC's submission. I will be also submitting<br>
these in my own capacity.<br>
<br>
KK<br>
<br>
<br>
On 21/07/2010 17:59, "Robin Gross"<<a href="mailto:robin@ipjustice.org" target="_blank">robin@ipjustice.org</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
I haven't written anything myself and was hoping to provide comments and sign-on<br>
to a group statement.<br>
<br>
If there isn't enough time to get NCSG support for a consolidated set of<br>
comments, we can probably get NCUC support and submit them as such.<br>
<br>
Perhaps what we need at this point is for KK, Mary,& Wendy's comments to be<br>
consolidated into a single statement the group can support (either NCUC or NCSG).<br>
<br>
Anyone want to take a stab at consolidation of the various parts in the next few<br>
hours?<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
Robin<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
On Jul 21, 2010, at 8:26 AM, Avri Doria wrote:<br>
<br>
Hi,<br>
<br>
Well we certainly don't have time for a vote, and this does fall under their<br>
responsibility for a NCSG statement as defined in the charter we approved.<br>
<br>
<br>
Discussion and development of substantive policies and statements issued in the<br>
name of the NCSG. This activity will require coordination with the membership<br>
and the Interest-Groups;<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Of course the constituency and candidate constituency/interest-groups can also<br>
submit one under their names according to their various procedures.<br>
<br>
And the individuals can submit, under their names and the names of their<br>
organizations.<br>
<br>
a.<br>
<br>
On 21 Jul 2010, at 11:18, Wendy Seltzer wrote:<br>
<br>
<br>
Thanks Avri.<br>
<br>
Group, what procedures do we want to follow for submitting comments, especially<br>
for those due today on DAG4 (where we have several distinct segments)? Should we<br>
each submit what we've written individually, and follow up with NCSG endorsement<br>
if the policy council approves? (as Avri suggested in response to another thread)<br>
<br>
--Wendy<br>
<br>
On 07/21/2010 11:08 AM, Avri Doria wrote:<br>
<br>
hi,<br>
<br>
just did a quick update of the comment list on the wiki<br>
<br>
<a href="https://st.icann.org/ncsg-ec/index.cgi?comment_periods_and_volunteers" target="_blank">https://st.icann.org/ncsg-ec/index.cgi?comment_periods_and_volunteers</a><br>
<br>
noticed a lot of things were ending today. tough there have been a few<br>
extensions in general.<br>
<br>
<br>
a.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Pierce Law | University of New Hampshire - An Innovative Partnership<br>
<<a href="http://www.piercelaw.edu/" target="_blank">http://www.piercelaw.edu/</a>><br>
</blockquote>
-- <br>
Wendy Seltzer -- <a href="mailto:wendy@seltzer.org" target="_blank">wendy@seltzer.org</a><br>
Fellow, Silicon Flatirons Center at University of Colorado Law School<br>
Fellow, Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University<br>
<a href="http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/seltzer.html" target="_blank">http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/seltzer.html</a><br>
<a href="http://www.chillingeffects.org/" target="_blank">http://www.chillingeffects.org/</a><br>
<a href="https://www.torproject.org/" target="_blank">https://www.torproject.org/</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>