[ncsg-policy] Re: Comment periods / DAG4

[Avri Doria]

hi,

I submitted 4, one being an amplification of another:

Dealing with the incitement clause in MAPO Objections.  Since the NCSG is taking a postion against MAPO in general and these are comments on a clause within MAPO, I do not expect NCSG endorsement

1. http://forum.icann.org/lists/4gtld-procedures/msg00003.html - add disability, secual oritentation and gener expression to incitement clasue

2. http://forum.icann.org/lists/4gtld-procedures/msg00005.html - add political or other opinion to incitement clause

Dealing with the Objection procedure in general as a Denial of Service attack.  This could be endorsed.

3.  http://forum.icann.org/lists/4gtld-procedures/msg00004.html

Calculation of community status.  Not a political issue, but perhaps NCSG can endorse it based on the fact that many non commercial applicants could be asking for community priority in order to avoid facing a auction against deep corporate pocket.

4. http://forum.icann.org/lists/4gtld-contention/msg00006.html

I recommend that someone create a list of all of them and see if we have rough consensus of the PC.

Alternatively, someone could set up a doodle poll where each of the proposals can be voted for or against by the member of the policy committee - and I suppose anyone else that cares to voice their opinion. Those that get consensus of the PC get endorsement.

BTW the current membership of the Policy-Committee is:

2 members per Constieucy/Interst Group  - NCUC - Robin, Milton
1 observer per Candidate constituency/Interst-Group - Alex
The 6 council members - Bill, Debbie, Mary, Rafik, Rosemary, Wendy
NCSG-EC chair - Avri

The PC does not have a chair yet, and i am ineligible per the charter we approved.

As the comment period is over, I do not know how much time we have to get a endorsement comment in.

a.



On 22 Jul 2010, at 10:32, Wendy Seltzer wrote:

> NCSG and NCSG-Policy:
> 
> Could we please compile a list of the comments members have submitted on DAG4 for which we might seek Stakeholder Group endorsement, and then take whatever steps necessary to determine whether to endorse them?  I believe that such endorsement would be accepted even though the comment period has closed.
> 
> I know Konstantinos, Mary, Robin, Avri, Debbie, and I have submitted comments, and I'm sure others have as well.  I have not reviewed the full list, and do not know whether all authors would seek SG endorsement.  How should we proceed?
> 
> Thanks,
> --Wendy
> 
> On 07/21/2010 03:16 PM, Mary Wong wrote:
>> Likewise (it's now 3.15 a.m. in Singapore :) and I apologize once again for not
>> having been able to circulate my draft comments before today.
>> I support Wendy's and Avri's earlier suggestion for each of us to send in the
>> comments individually.
>> I also encourage NCSG and NCUC members to log on to
>> http://forum.icann.org/lists/4gtld-guide/ to endorse comments with which they
>> agree. At the moment, Wendy, my and Konstantinos' comments are already up.
>> Thanks,
>> Mary
>> *Mary W S Wong*
>> Professor of Law&  Chair, Graduate IP Programs
>> Franklin Pierce Law Center
>> Two White Street
>> Concord, NH 03301
>> USA
>> Email: mwong at piercelaw.edu<mailto:mwong at piercelaw.edu>
>> Phone: 1-603-513-5143
>> Webpage: http://www.piercelaw.edu/marywong/index.php
>> Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at:
>> http://ssrn.com/author=437584
>> 
>>  >>>
>> *From: * 	Konstantinos Komaitis<k.komaitis at STRATH.AC.UK>
>> *To:* 	<NCSG-NCUC-DISCUSS at listserv.syr.edu>
>> *Date: * 	7/21/2010 1:16 PM
>> *Subject: * 	Re: Comment periods
>> 
>> It is pretty late here and I don't have time to compile the comments myself.
>> However, please use them as part of NCUC's submission. I will be also submitting
>> these in my own capacity.
>> 
>> KK
>> 
>> 
>> On 21/07/2010 17:59, "Robin Gross"<robin at ipjustice.org>  wrote:
>> 
>> I haven't written anything myself and was hoping to provide comments and sign-on
>> to a group statement.
>> 
>> If there isn't enough time to get NCSG support for a consolidated set of
>> comments, we can probably get NCUC support and submit them as such.
>> 
>> Perhaps what we need at this point is for KK, Mary,&  Wendy's comments to be
>> consolidated into a single statement the group can support (either NCUC or NCSG).
>> 
>> Anyone want to take a stab at consolidation of the various parts in the next few
>> hours?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Robin
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Jul 21, 2010, at 8:26 AM, Avri Doria wrote:
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Well we certainly don't have time for a vote, and this does fall under their
>> responsibility for a NCSG statement as defined in the charter we approved.
>> 
>> 
>> Discussion and development of substantive policies and statements issued in the
>> name of the NCSG. This activity will require coordination with the membership
>> and the Interest-Groups;
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Of course the constituency and candidate constituency/interest-groups can also
>> submit one under their names according to their various procedures.
>> 
>> And the individuals can submit, under their names and the names of their
>> organizations.
>> 
>> a.
>> 
>> On 21 Jul 2010, at 11:18, Wendy Seltzer wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> Thanks Avri.
>> 
>> Group, what procedures do we want to follow for submitting comments, especially
>> for those due today on DAG4 (where we have several distinct segments)? Should we
>> each submit what we've written individually, and follow up with NCSG endorsement
>> if the policy council approves? (as Avri suggested in response to another thread)
>> 
>> --Wendy
>> 
>> On 07/21/2010 11:08 AM, Avri Doria wrote:
>> 
>> hi,
>> 
>> just did a quick update of the comment list on the wiki
>> 
>> https://st.icann.org/ncsg-ec/index.cgi?comment_periods_and_volunteers
>> 
>> noticed a lot of things were ending today. tough there have been a few
>> extensions in general.
>> 
>> 
>> a.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Pierce Law | University of New Hampshire - An Innovative Partnership
>> <http://www.piercelaw.edu/>
> -- 
> Wendy Seltzer -- wendy at seltzer.org
> Fellow, Silicon Flatirons Center at University of Colorado Law School
> Fellow, Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University
> http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/seltzer.html
> http://www.chillingeffects.org/
> https://www.torproject.org/