Discussion of ICANN strategic plan

[Hakikur Rahman]

In favor we support any sort of assistance "for workshops and technical
forums in
developing countries", and this would enhance local level coordinations,
though during the previous years it has increased a lot. People among the
communities are aware of the international events, even they can not
participate.

Thanks for sharing the information with the group.

Best Regards.
Hakik.

At 03:07 AM 1/26/05, Milton Mueller wrote:
>Some time in the next week we will teleconference with ICANN staff
>about the strategic plan. I am formulating a response. One issue strikes
>me as open to debate. ICANN proposes to create a "Restricted Fund for
>Developing Country Internet Communities."
>
>Do we favor or oppose?
>
>In favor: ICANN provides support for workshops and technical forums in
>developing countries. The governance model of ICANN has been critizied
>by many on grounds that it does not foster participation from developing
>countries. This can be viewed as an appropriate response.
>
>Oppose: this steps outside of ICANN's coordination role and makes it
>into a much more expansive welfare state type of agency. Those who are
>supported by ICANN are also, to a large degree, under the control of
>ICANN; it might be better for independent agencies (foundations, higher
>education institutions, civil society organizations, governments) to
>provide this kind of support.
>
>Please give me your opinion.


--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.7.5 - Release Date: 1/26/05