[ncdnhc-discuss] No proxy system for NCDNHC.

[Harold J. Feld]

It enables those at the meeting to speak on significant policy matters 
with some authority.  Yes, this creates risk.  But I feel this is better 
than being paralyzed at critical moments.

Harold

Milton Mueller wrote:

> Erick:
> What is wrong with the current system? 
> Now, the face to face meetings must be ratified by online voting. 
> There is no need for blindly giving a proxy to someone, who will 
> vote on questions you may not even have anticipated. Instead, 
> now you vote for yourself. The f2f meetings cannot do anything
> without you.
> 
> --MM
> 
> 
>>>>Erick Iriarte Ahon <faia at amauta.rcp.net.pe> 10/24/02 11:23AM >>>
>>>>
> Yes, is better the face to face... but is not possible, because not all
> can 
> travel to shangai, and is necessary find some ways to express the
> ideas, 
> and the possibility of representation by proxy, is one of the best
> ways.
> 
> Perharps for the "next meeting" of the Constituency, we can prepare
> this...
> 
> Erick
> 
> 
> At 11:02 a.m. 24/10/2002 -0400, you wrote:
> 
>>A much belated view that I think the proxy is an idea with a lot of
>>
> value, 
> 
>>that should be explored further.  I continue to believe that face to
>>
> face 
> 
>>meetings are important.  I think YJ has offered a way that, even with
>>
> a 
> 
>>limited number of people, the meetings can be even more valuable and 
>>productive.
>>
>>Kathy Kleiman
>>ACM-IGP
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at icann-ncc.org
> http://www.icann-ncc.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> 
> 
>