[ncdnhc-discuss] CPTech statement on GA rebid vote

[Adam Peake]

Dave, to call the list who voted "chronically-dissatisfied, vigorous 
complainers" is bullshit.

Look down the list and you will people who have contributed 
significant unpaid effort over many years.

Remind us: just what contribution have you made to ICANN?  Pointers 
to papers, committees joined, advice offered (not just replies to the 
work of those many people you dislike, but some original thoughts of 
your own.)

Thanks,

Adam


At 7:48 AM -0700 5/24/02, Dave Crocker wrote:
>At 10:37 AM 5/24/2002 -0400, Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law wrote:
>>I think its importance is hypothetical - it depends what ICANN tries to
>>announce it has consensus for in about a month.
>
>References to Internet rough consensus do not require unanimity.  In fact
>for any interesting topic, there is always somebody, somewhere who unhappy
>with the consensus view.
>
>The fact that a clique of chronically-dissatisfied, vigorous complainers
>have -- once again -- said that they are dissatisfied, does not constitute
>refutation of a claim of rough consensus.
>
>d/
>
>
>----------
>Dave Crocker <mailto:dave at tribalwise.com>
>TribalWise, Inc. <http://www.tribalwise.com>
>tel +1.408.246.8253; fax +1.408.850.1850