[ncdnhc-discuss] Internet is global=we need central planning
Kent Crispin
kent at songbird.com
Wed May 1 19:11:52 CEST 2002
On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 12:48:14PM -0400, James Love wrote:
> Maybe Dave Crocker is right. Maybe the entire world has never figured out
> how to coordinate any global allocation decisions without a single global
> body making *all* of the decisions.
That is basically correct, though there is an ambiguity in the scope of
your use of the term "*all*".
> On the other hand, maybe Dave Crocker
> is blind to the world around him, which has functioned for a long time
> without such global central planning agencies.
Sorry, that is incorrect. In every singele case, where there is actual
global allocation taking place, such agencies/authorities/agreements do
in fact exist.
> Maybe he can't see the
> connection between the world outside of ICANN and the world that ICANN wants
> to create. My advice is "wake up." If ICANN can identify some stuff that
> requires global decision making by a single body, the burden should be on
> ICANN to say what it is.
It has done so. You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make him
drink, etc.
> And ICANN should allow local decision making when
> the issues do not require global policy making.
It does.
> We already have more than
> 100 ccTLDS that are not regulated by ICANN. If ICANN disappeared tomorrow,
> no one would notice.
That's not true.
> If ICANN wants to find a place to be useful, it needs
> to be more modest about what it insists of doing.
ICANN has been modest in its claims from the beginning. Your imaginary
all-powerful ICANN is just a figment of your imagination.
> It could play a role in
> doing some of the TLD coordination. It shouldn't be czar of all TLD
> decisions.
It isn't.
> If ICANN can't share power, maybe ICANN should be killed, and we
> should find a body that doesn't have to be the ultimate galaxy wide god of
> all decisions. I shouldn't have to explain to the ICANN staff or Dave
> Crocker why it is feasible to make decisions locally, and coordinate
> minimalist globally. Pick up a phone a dial a phone number. It works,
> globally.
And there is a global agreement (ie, authority) about how that is done.
> IP numbers are assigned by regional bodies.
Under a global agreement, with an agency that hands out the global
assignments.
> ccTLDs deal with
> national governments.
Sometimes they do, sometimes they don't
> ISOC has local chapters. Someone somewhere must have
> the brains to draw the line between local and global decision making.
It would help to start with facts instead of imagination.
--
Kent Crispin "Be good, and you will be
Technical Support Manager, ICANN lonesome."
crispin at icann.org,kent at songbird.com -- Mark Twain
More information about the Ncuc-discuss
mailing list