[ncdnhc-discuss] Board retreats and fully transparent process for ICANN

[KathrynKL at aol.com]

Courts, trials, Congress, City halls, Shareholder meetings, the Federal 
Communications Commission, the North American Numbering Council and that's 
just the short list off the top of my head.  

Open and Transparent was what we requested and what we received in the White 
Paper and the By-laws of ICANN.  It is a promised now being practiced in the 
breach.  It is unfair to us, and to the Internet community to hold closed 
meetings.


> The idea that the Board should be prohibited from having any discussions 
> that are away from the circus of a public fishbowl is quite impressive.
> 
> Please cite any other global operations administrations organizations that 
> are subject to such extreme restrictions?
> 
> d/
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20020527/b26a1fea/attachment.html>