[ncdnhc-discuss] 2002 1st Adcom Meeting Report!

[faia at amauta.rcp.net.pe]

Hi to all

Nice question dear James!

I only say some things.

1. I participate in the UDRP Task Force by suggestions of the ccTLD 
constituency and with the support of the non commercial NC representatives.
I was nominated by the .PE (Peru) becuase my expertise in Computer Law. I'm not 
the representative of .PE in the cctld constituency, the representative is 
Eduardo Santoyo, Administrative Contact and manager of .PE.

2. Beside that, the .PE is administrated by the Peruvian Scientific Network, 
which is a non-profit organizacion (http://www.rcp.org.pe) pionner in the 
Internet development in Latinamerica. Its main focus is in social project's for 
development Internet in Peru, and it is integrated by NGO's from civil rights, 
universities, asociations, and another organizations. 

The RCP works in the Comunitaries Internet Centers Project (Cabinas Publicas), 
and this permit a connections of hundreds of thousands of people in Peru. The 
peruvian model of Comunitaries Internet Centers has been used as a reference in 
several countries in Latin America and Africa.

3. Since i have been always a person exclusively involved in non-commercial 
activities i think that i can represent the non commercial interest with 
success.

4. I believe that there is not any conflict of interests in this case. 


Hoping that those clarification would be enough, 


Erick.

> James Love wrote:
> > 
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > > - We discussed about Erick's status in UDRP TF as a ccTLD
> representative
> > > even though he is an NC member in NCDNHC constituency. But we agreed
> that
> > > ccTLD's interest is more complex and not simply commercial, so no
> problem
> > > in his maintenance of his status as ccTLD rep. in UDRP TF.
> > >
> > > - As Erick wanted to take, Erick would join in Transfer and New TLD
> TFs.
> > 
> >      What does this mean?  Are we sending someone who works for an
> existing
> > registry to represent domain name holders in the Transfer and New TLD
> TFs?
> > Can the Ad Com explain why this does not present a conflict of
> interest?
> > 
> >  Jamie
> -
> Hi Jamie
> Didn't you submit a resolution about conflict of interest?
> I am pretty sure that the f2f discussion about it will look funny.
> Unfortunately, It will become extremely difficult to the new ADCOM to
> justify not to accept the membership of FRAX/Jefsey Morin or even Potter
> Yachter/Kent Crispin.
> I am glad to have rejected the election process.
> Dany
> - 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Discuss mailing list
> > Discuss at icann-ncc.org
> > http://www.icann-ncc.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> 
> -- 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> Dany VANDROMME                    |  Directeur du GIP RENATER
> 
>                 Reseau National de Telecommunications
>          pour la Technologie, l'Enseignement et la Recherche
> 
>                                   |  ENSAM
> Tel   :  +33 (0)1 53 94 20 30     |  151 Boulevard de l'Hopital
> Fax   :  +33 (0)1 53 94 20 31     |  75013 Paris
> E-mail: Dany.Vandromme at renater.fr |  FRANCE
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at icann-ncc.org
> http://www.icann-ncc.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>