[ncdnhc-discuss] Comments on draft 7.

[Joop Teernstra]

At 19:23 6/03/02 -0800, Barbara Simons wrote:
>I also agree that the At Large should not be described as
>an At Large organization.  If it is so labelled, then it becomes
>equivalent to the other SOs, each of which represents a
>special interest.  Rather, the At Large is supposed to represent
>the public.

I don't disagree, but when the At Large self-organizes, does it not become 
an organization?
If it does not self-organize, is "the public" then not  waiting to be 
organized by the ICANN staff?

--Joop
www.icannatlarge.com