[ncdnhc-discuss] Comments on draft 7.

[Barbara Simons]

I also agree that the At Large should not be described as
an At Large organization.  If it is so labelled, then it becomes
equivalent to the other SOs, each of which represents a
special interest.  Rather, the At Large is supposed to represent
the public.
Regard,
Barbara

Raul Echeberria wrote:

>
>
>
> All the document is based in the evaluation of the ALSC recommendations and not discuss them. The
> key mistake for me is to consider  the ALSO as other SO. The At Large Membership (some persons
> prefer name it as ALSO) should not be a Supporting Organization. The current three SO have their
> specific scope and the ALM is the opposite , is a body of persons with generic interest in ICANN
> related matters.
>
> My view is that the ALM should not assume direct policy-making roles.
>
> If we consider the ALM just as another SO, then, most of the comments made in the section 4.
> “Impact analysis - Evaluation against established criteria” could be valid, but due to the fact
> that I disagree with this basic concept, then most of the comments addressed in section 4 are
> wrong from my point of view.
> I understand that you have focused the document in the evaluation of the ALSC instead of discuss
> them.
> I think that this format is very strict and don't allow to see clearly the different points of
> view.
>
>
>
> Conclusions:
>
> I don't  support the conclusions included in this document with exception of point  5.1 . Is also
> important to remark that as I have said before, I don’t subscribe what has been included in the
> report as the “Key recommendation” what imply to absolutely change the concept of the ALM
> transforming it in a single constituency inside DNSO with the only difference  that this
> constituency could elect directly some board Directors.
>
>
> Finally, I'd like to state that the level of participation in the TF until now has been absolutely
> insufficient to produce an official report.
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Raul
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20020306/73b6c5fe/attachment-0001.html>