[ncdnhc-discuss] nomcom

[Alejandro Pisanty - DGSCA y FQ, UNAM]

James,

I take seriously your question on the Nominating Committee proposal. But I
have to answer your question with a question, because that is the status
as you surely noticed when reading the E&R Committee paper: assuming that
there will be a NomCom, what do you think its size should be? how should
it be composed? what can be done to define the desirable profiles of its
members, their origin, their diversity, and their responsiveness to the
needs of the broadest set of communities possible, ie openness?

Please note the assumption. It won't be too useful, in reply to this
question, to challenge the NomCom concept, etc., notwithstanding a wide
range of valid concerns. The question has deliberately been left open.
There have been a number of proposals to answer it, most of them published
in the public forum, and we are awaiting further input which will be most
valued.

Yours,

Alejandro Pisanty


.  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .
     Dr. Alejandro Pisanty
Director General de Servicios de Computo Academico
UNAM, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico
Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico
Tel. (+52-55) 5622-8541, 5622-8542 Fax 5550-8540
http://www.dgsca.unam.mx
*
** 10 Aniversario de Internet Society - www.inet2002.org en Washington, DC
---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico, www.isoc.org
 Participa en ICANN, www.icann.org
.  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .



On Tue, 4 Jun 2002, James Love wrote:

> Jefsey is right.  The NomCom *is* the membership, for all practical
> purposes.  So, Alejandro, Vint, Joe Sims and others should provide some
> detail on this detail.   Who will be on the NomCom?  How many people will be
> on the NomCom?  Who appoints people to be on the NomCom?  Does the BOD
> appoint the members of the NomCom?    Does the NomCom apoint its own
> members?   Do the SO's appoint the NomCom members?  Do domain holders vote
> to put people on the NomCom?   .......My guess, the BOD would prefer to
> control who is on the NomCom.
>
> Interesting  note also is that a bare majority on the NomCom is a
> supermajority on the board, because the board itself appoints several board
> members.
>
> Jamie
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "J-F C. (Jefsey) Morfin" <jefsey at club-internet.fr>
> To: <discuss at icann-ncc.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 7:08 AM
> Subject: Re: [ncdnhc-discuss] Trashing Our Founding Principles
>
>
> : On 17:56 03/06/02, DannyYounger at cs.com said:
> : >a true membership organization with the membership electing their own
> : >leadership and Board.
> :
> : Dear Danny,
> : the point is who would be the members? In the Reform Committee Plan there
> : is a Membership: it is the NomComgress.
> :
> : You will not change something which has been agreed and decided and that
> : everyone will support including you very soon (as long as Joe resigned,
> : McLougling went awayand Stuart Lynn removed his claim on the root server
> : system and ICANN on IANA).
> :
> : What is open is the IANA assignement and the NomComgress designation. What
> : you want is a representative NomComgress. I would advise 1000+ membres:
> one
> : GAC, one ccTLD, one @large per country plus representatives from ISOC,
> : Consumers, Civil Right. They want to avoid capture and costs, this does
> not
> : mean 20 people only in the committee. Again the proper test which was
> : proposed: could Karl and Andy as well as Nii and Katho be elected with
> that
> : system?
> :
> : jfc
> :
> :
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at icann-ncc.org
> http://www.icann-ncc.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>