[ncdnhc-discuss] Montevideo and MArina del REy resolutions

Erick Iriarte faia at amauta.rcp.net.pe
Mon Jan 14 19:20:42 CET 2002


Hi Milton

I take my responsability and participate more in the group.

Thanks for your comments

Erick Iriarte

At 04:09 p.m. 1/14/2002 -0500, Milton Mueller wrote:
>Erick:
>Yes, please do take responsibility for
>participating more actively.
>
>Resolutions at face-to-face meetings
>typically pass with 30 or so votes, and
>the online votes typically involve 40
>or so votes.
>
>No resolution has ever been passed or
>confined to "two or three" people.
>
>--MM
>
> >>> Erick Iriarte <faia at amauta.rcp.net.pe> 01/14/02 11:52 AM >>>
>Hi!
>
>The problem not is Vany, the problem is us. Because we don't participate in
>the discuss, and we don't have clear some things, how much people is
>necessary to aproved a resolution? one, two, all?
>
>i don't know, but two or three people don't make the correct answer to all.
>You can say, that some people don't say anything, but the democracy is the
>possibility of the silence.
>
>But the silence of a lot of us is the problem.
>
>Vany is right is necessary more participation, but if nobody participate,
>all the resolutions will be maked by two or three.
>
>See you.
>
>Erick
>
>At 11:13 a.m. 1/14/2002 -0500, KathrynKL at aol.com wrote:
> >Vany wrote:
> ><<Just for clarify, what the whole membership will do in February (after
> >an AdCom decision of such an schedule
> >which I was against since I was pushing since December to vote on
> >resolutions before NC had to make
> >any decision regarding .ORG) is to VOTE on resolutions regardless the
> >results (aprooval or disaprooval).>>
> >
> >It is my understanding that materials, including the Names Council .ORG
> >proposals, have been changing.  It might have been hard to vote in
> >December.   But we have certainly been discussing the .ORG and other
> >issues since before the November meeting and continued this consultation,
> >withupdates and drafts, after the November meeting.  To me, this makes
> >the consultation process very important and worthwhile.
> >
> >But I share a question with Vany:  what are the resolutions on the table
> >right now.  What was adopted in November?  Which ones will be voted on at
> >the March ICANN meeting?  Which ones will be used by our NCC Names Council
> >members to share our views and concerns with the Names Council and ICANN
> >Board?
> >
> >regards, kathy ACM-IGP
> >
> >




More information about the Ncuc-discuss mailing list