Who is keeping scores? Re: [ncdnhc-discuss] AboutMarketing Practices in .ORG

[Nilda Vany Martinez Grajales]

Milton:

Milton Mueller wrote:
> 
> >>> Nilda Vany Martinez Grajales <vany at sdnp.org.pa> 01/01/02 02:40 AM >>>
> > My role as a Names Council member is what you said
> > above and I always has reflected the wishes of the
> > NCDNHC in the Names Council.
> 
> The support of this constituency for the Sponsored,
> Unrestricted option was clear and voted on. On Dec. 13,

Milton, I wasn't in the teleconference, but I heard the mp3.
As far as I know, the Names Council didn't voted in the
Policy Statement on .ORG yet.   What other NC members of other
constituency requested
was more time to consider it.   


> Vany voted to refuse to accept that option, by
> expressing her support for delaying the Task
> Force and forcing it to come up with a different
> option.

Milton.  What you are saying misinforms the NCDNHC members about the
instructions 
I provided to you and YJ for the Names Council meeting on December 13.
 
1.  I acknowledged, for the purposes of December 13 meeting, the results
of
    NCDNHC MdR meeting by instructing to YJ, my proxy, that in the event
that the 
    Names Council make votation on the Policy Statement on .ORG, then my
vote be
    "In favor".
    Everybody can verify this here: 
http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/council/Arc06/msg00503.html

2.  I stated that in the event that any member of the Names Council
propose to postpone voting
    the Policy Statement on .ORG, also I instructed my vote "in favor".  
    http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/council/Arc06/msg00503.html          

3.  Futher, I explained the reason why I would support to postpone
voting, which basically I said that I think
    that Louis Touton comments deserves consideration of all
constituencies that might wish to discuss it before holding 
    any voting regarding Statement Policy on .ORG
    http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/council/Arc06/msg00506.html

Milton, please stop to misinform the members on the things I have said
or done.  Remember that my comments are in public lists, and futher
remember that there is an mp3 recording of what happened in the meeting,
and unless my English is too bad (which think is pretty good), no vote
on Policy Statement on .ORG has taken place yet within the Names
Council.  It is not the same
to request a delay of a voting than to have voted against something.

In fact, the only thing  I have heard from all constituencies said in
general is that they need more time for discuss within
their own constituencies on .ORG.
 
> I hope that in the January Names Council meeting
> Vany will respect the wishes of the NCDNHC to
> keep .org unrestricted.

I hope that my request to finally make the votaion on MdR resolutions
take place and results be published
before January 16.  I have one month at least insisting to the AdCom to
organize the voting, and two weeks
ago the last document that Chun needed was submited in order to begin
online voting...and for any reasons
my requests and comments regarding voting issue are being ignored.   

Best Regards
Vany













> 
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at icann-ncc.org
> http://www.icann-ncc.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

-- 
Nilda Vany Martinez Grajales, BSEE
Information Technology Specialist
Sustainable Development Networking Programme/Panama
Member of the ICANN's DNSO Non-Commercial Constituency
Tel: (507) 317-0169
http://www.sdnp.org.pa
e-mail:  vany at sdnp.org.pa

Are you a Non-Commercial organization and have a domain name?
Join the ICANN's DNSO Non-Commercial Constituency, ncdnhc.icann-ncc.org