[ncdnhc-discuss] Election results! NOT TRUSTED

[Adam Peake]

Dany, it seems Pablo Allietti should not have been excluded from the 
voting list. Instituto Nacional de Investigacion Agropecuaria has 
been a member since February 4, 2000 and he has been their 
representative for as long as I remember (i.e. since I maintained the 
member list, some time ago.)

A runoff would, I think, be fairest way to resolve this, unless, of 
course, either you or Erick wish to withdraw.

Proposal:

Only those who cast votes in the first stage of the election will be 
eligible to vote.  (Those of us who did not vote last week, or 
whenever it was, do not get to vote in the runoff.)

Dany and Erick are given 3 days (from some date set by the Adcom) to 
produce a 500 word (maximum) statement.

These statements sent to voters with the ballot, straight up and 
down, Erick or Dany. 

Thanks,

Adam





>Milton Mueller wrote:
>>
>>  Here are the results of the NCDNH Constituency vote.
>>  A complete, statistical report will be sent to the
>>  constituency by the election operator (Elisabeth
>>  Porteneuve) tomorrow (Feb. 27).
>>
>>  1. All resolutions were ratified by substantial margins
>>
>>  2. New Adcom:
>>     Eung Hwi CHUN, AP
>>     Dany Vandromme, EU
>>     Harold Feld, NA
>>     Thierry Amoussoubgo, AF
>>     Erick Iriarte, LAC
>>
>>  3. New Names Council members:
>>     Eung Hwi CHUN, AP - 18 votes
>>     Harold Feld, NA  - 10 votes
>>
>>     Tie:
>  >    Erick Iriarte, LAC - 5 votes
>>     (note: includes INIA vote)
>>     Dany Vandromme, EU - 5 votes
>>
>>  4. We have two options:
>>     a. One of the two tied candidates can withdraw, if
>>        they wish to concede to the other. Of course,
>>        both candidates have every right to remain if
>>        they choose.
>>     b. We can hold a runoff election between these two
>>        candidates.
>>
>>     So, Dany, Erick, please indicate your intention
>>  and if necessary we will proceed with a direct runoff
>>  between Dany Vandromme and Erick Iriarte. We need to
>>  hear from you by Friday.
>>
>-
>Milton and others:
>
>This election has been a complet failure.
>It is the first time in my life I see a vote, with the voting list not
>closed before the start of the vote, the closing date not respected, and
>the voting officers including votes not supported by a ballot. The vote
>results should have been posted as planned on Feb 23th. They were not,
>because the voting rules were not fully understood by the voting
>officers, nor by voters.
>Membership list were supposed closed from Friday 8th. From that, the
>draft voting list was produced on thursday, but none of the voting
>officer did check and close it prior the vote start.
>
>A tie vote, which is not part of the established voting rules, with an
>undefined voting list would not produce the same result for the last NC
>rep, since emanating from a different distribution of voters, with
>different rationale for voting.
>
>The vote are so clear to everyone that we see now members, voting for
>the tie, before that the vote has been organized and opened:
>======================================================================================
>Subject: [ncdnhc-adcom] Re: [ncdnhc-discuss] Re: [Fwd: Fwd: Ballot 
>Not received]
>Date:    Mon, 25 Feb 2002 10:30:26 -0500
>From:    Pablo Allietti <pabloa at inia.org.uy>
>Organization:  INIA La Estanzuela
>To:      YJ Park <yjpark at myepark.com>
>CC:      Elisabeth Porteneuve <Elisabeth.Porteneuve at cetp.ipsl.fr>,
>          vany_martinez at yahoo.com, vany at sdnp.org.pa,
>          Milton Mueller <mueller at syracuse.edu>, raul at inia.org.uy,
>          adcom at icann-ncc.org
>References: 1 , 2
>
>YJ Park wrote:
>>
>
>I Vote for Erick Iriarte.
>Thnk you for your kind attention.
>Pablo Allietti
>
>>  Pabloa,
>>
>>  _______________________________________________
>>  Discuss mailing list
>>  Discuss at icann-ncc.org
>>  http://www.icann-ncc.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>========================================================================================
>
>I do not want to participate to this system. The constituency is going
>nowhere with such a lack of formalism and rules, except to be completely
>disfranchised within the DNSO and the ICANN.
>Once more, the adcom has proved to be unable to manage the constituency.
>As adcom member, I tried to keep the vote on the right track at the
>begining, to fix a first failure of the voting officers before the
>start. As candidate, I was not in a position to do anything else, except
>observing what was going on. Too much for me!
>
>I have no trust anymore in this vote process and I am not going to
>support it by participating to the second round, and I will not
>participate to this non-trusted adcom (not because of candidates, but
>because the election process).
>
>I let Erik Iriarte to appreciate the situation for himself.
>
>Dany
>
>--
>-------------------------------------------------------------------
>Dany VANDROMME                    |  Directeur du GIP RENATER
>
>                 Reseau National de Telecommunications
>          pour la Technologie, l'Enseignement et la Recherche
>
>                                   |  ENSAM
>Tel   :  +33 (0)1 53 94 20 30     |  151 Boulevard de l'Hopital
>Fax   :  +33 (0)1 53 94 20 31     |  75013 Paris
>E-mail: Dany.Vandromme at renater.fr |  FRANCE
>--------------------------------------------------------------------
>_______________________________________________
>Discuss mailing list
>Discuss at icann-ncc.org
>http://www.icann-ncc.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss