[ncdnhc-discuss] One suggestion for .ORG TF participant!

Alejandro Pisanty - DGSCA y FQ, UNAM apisan at servidor.unam.mx
Thu Apr 25 16:26:43 CEST 2002


Milton,

thanks for your reply; mine was a question, not advice.

Rest assured that you are not perceived as a threat.

Your turn into a constructive attitude would seem to mean that your
disagreement is a lot less strong than your words.

Alejandro Pisanty


.  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .
     Dr. Alejandro Pisanty
Director General de Servicios de Computo Academico
UNAM, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico
Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico
Tel. (+52-55) 5622-8541, 5622-8542 Fax 5550-8405
http://www.dgsca.unam.mx
*
** 10 Aniversario de Internet Society - www.inet2002.org en Washington, DC
---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico, www.isoc.org
 Participa en ICANN, www.icann.org
.  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .



On Thu, 25 Apr 2002, Milton Mueller wrote:

> Martin Luther Mueller here, ready to do the constituency's service.
>
> Keep in mind that this is a very short (ten-day) review of a staff RFP.
> The DNSO TF will not have the leverage to force a major rewriting.
> The purpose of the review is to make sure that the RFP
> meets DNSO policy. I will be one of seven TF members.
> I will not be, and cannot be under the rules, reinstated as
> chair of the TF.
>
> Alejandro's response is a prime example of what's wrong
> with the dominant Board-faction's mentality. I played a major
> role in forming the initial policy, and am almost certainly in
> the best position to follow up at this stage. Yet, because I
> am critical of the Board I am perceived as a threat, and A.
> proposes that the policy making processes must
> be rigged to exclude people who disagree rather than used
> as a method to forge agreement. I'm sure the constituency
> will reject his "advice."
>
> >>> "Alejandro Pisanty - DGSCA y FQ, UNAM"
>
> Are we right in assigning him a task that he could either find thankless
> beyond belief, being so contrary to his beliefs, or deliberately try to
> redirect? In my predominantly Catholic country they call this "Putting the
> Church in Luther's hands" - I hope not to offend any sensitivities by
> using this saying. The contrast in the phrase is meant to emphasize that
> this measure would be unwise.
>
> I should add that in the present stage it would be particularly valuable
> to be represented by someone with at least an appreciation of real-life
> service operations of the Internet.
>
> Yours,
>
> Alejandro Pisanty
>
>
> .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .
>      Dr. Alejandro Pisanty
> Director General de Servicios de Computo Academico
> UNAM, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico
> Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico
> Tel. (+52-55) 5622-8541, 5622-8542 Fax 5550-8405
> http://www.dgsca.unam.mx
> *
> ** 10 Aniversario de Internet Society - www.inet2002.org en Washington, DC
> ---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico, www.isoc.org
>  Participa en ICANN, www.icann.org
> .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .
>
>
>
> On Thu, 25 Apr 2002, Chun Eung Hwi wrote:
>
> > Dear NCDNHC members,
> >
> >
> > As you know, the ICANN Secretariat posted its timeline for .ORG a few days
> > ago. According to that schedule, it would post its RFP on the 1st of May.
> > And depending on Names Council policy advice, that RFP would go back to
> > .ORG Task Force for its review. So, .ORG Task Force would be reactivated.
> > In last Names Council teleconference, we were requested to appoint new
> > participant for that TF.
> >
> > According to that timeframe, that TF should finish their job until 12th of
> > May so that DNSO Names Council could provide official comment to ICANN
> > Secretariat. So, its time schedule is very tight. Therefore, we should
> > quickly determine who would join in that TF. So, I asked Milton Mueller to
> > come back again to that TF, and he expressed his willingness. We have no
> > more time. So, if there would be no serious objection to this suggestion
> > in this list and among adcom members, adcom would go ahead.
> >
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Chun Eung Hwi
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > Chun Eung Hwi
> > General Secretary, PeaceNet | phone:     (+82) 2- 2166-2216
> > Seoul Yangchun P.O.Box 81   |   pcs:     (+82) 019-259-2667
> > Seoul, 158-600, Korea       | eMail:   ehchun at peacenet.or.kr
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Discuss mailing list
> > Discuss at icann-ncc.org
> > http://www.icann-ncc.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at icann-ncc.org
> http://www.icann-ncc.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>





More information about the Ncuc-discuss mailing list