[ncdnhc-discuss] One suggestion for .ORG TF participant!

[James Love]

What do people think of having a two stage bidding process, where the
operator is choosen by the non-profit in a second stage, possibilty in a
competitive bid.

Jamie

----- Original Message -----
From: "Chun Eung Hwi" <ehchun at peacenet.or.kr>
To: <discuss at icann-ncc.org>
Cc: <adcom02 at icann-ncc.org>
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 6:24 PM
Subject: [ncdnhc-discuss] One suggestion for .ORG TF participant!


> Dear NCDNHC members,
>
>
> As you know, the ICANN Secretariat posted its timeline for .ORG a few days
> ago. According to that schedule, it would post its RFP on the 1st of May.
> And depending on Names Council policy advice, that RFP would go back to
> .ORG Task Force for its review. So, .ORG Task Force would be reactivated.
> In last Names Council teleconference, we were requested to appoint new
> participant for that TF.
>
> According to that timeframe, that TF should finish their job until 12th of
> May so that DNSO Names Council could provide official comment to ICANN
> Secretariat. So, its time schedule is very tight. Therefore, we should
> quickly determine who would join in that TF. So, I asked Milton Mueller to
> come back again to that TF, and he expressed his willingness. We have no
> more time. So, if there would be no serious objection to this suggestion
> in this list and among adcom members, adcom would go ahead.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Chun Eung Hwi
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> Chun Eung Hwi
> General Secretary, PeaceNet | phone:     (+82) 2- 2166-2216
> Seoul Yangchun P.O.Box 81   |   pcs:     (+82) 019-259-2667
> Seoul, 158-600, Korea       | eMail:   ehchun at peacenet.or.kr
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at icann-ncc.org
> http://www.icann-ncc.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
>