[ncdnhc-discuss] [Fwd: RE: [council] NDNHC summary of comments in response to Draft 6]

[Harold J. Feld]

Jamie's comments were echoed by others (at least in the general "I 
support Jamie's comments" with no reservations) and Jeffery Morfin 
voiced support for "governments or the ITU" (at least as I understood 
his message).  I saw little, if anything, negative to Jamie's specific 
recommendations re: the ITU.  I also take into account communications I 
received from members of the consticuency at the NGO meeting here in DC.

Harold

Milton Mueller wrote:

>As far as I am concerned there is very little support
>within NCDNHC for a greater ITU role. The only person
>I have seen express support for it is Jamie Love, and
>my impression is that it stems more from exasperation
>with the general obtuseness of ICANN and its Board than
>from any real understanding of ITU processes.
>
>--MM
>
>>>>"Harold J. Feld" <hfeld at mediaaccess.org> 04/24/02 09:11AM >>>
>>>>
>    From Tony Holmes, pertaining to comments by some in the NCC in 
>support of a greater ITU role in ICANN.
>
>-------- Original Message --------
>Subject: RE: [council] NDNHC summary of comments in response to Draft 6
>Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 08:34:15 +0100
>From: tony.ar.holmes at bt.com 
>To: hfeld at mediaaccess.org, council at dnso.org 
>
>As someone who's worked in the ITU for the last 10 years (and still does) I
>was surprised to learn there's growing support within the NCDHC for the ITU
>to assume greater responsibility. You say those arguing these positions say
>
>
>
>