[ncdnhc-discuss] comment: NC Task Forces

[Adam Peake]

>Yes, of course we on Names Council should inform
>you (NCDNHC members) of comment deadlines.
>
>In this case we did - an announcement
>was sent both to the discuss list and the full-
>membership announce list.


Did you, when?  I couldn't/can't find such a note.  One on ORG yes, 
but not review.


>But I agree with you
>that such messages are easy to miss. Not sure
>what to do about that except keep hammering
>away on the discuss list....
>
>You may be interested to learn that I had
>to send a semi-angry note to DNSO Secretariat
>to even get them to put the ORG call for
>comments on the home page of the DNSO.


Perhaps moving time sensitive information to the top of the DNSO page 
would be helpful. Should not be more than a few lines (small table), 
action dates requiring public comments, meeting dates, NC intake 
committee closing, etc.

Adam


><sigh>
>
>>>>  Adam Peake <ajp at glocom.ac.jp> 10/25/01 05:04AM >>>
>
>>Adam:
>>As much as I appreciate your willingness to make
>>comments (and agree with the comments you make)
>
>Milton, thanks,  Comments sent.
>
>It's tough work following these closed task forces, waiting for the
>Names Council to allow us in...
>
>>it is not very realistic for you to expect NC members
>>to go through the unnecessary and wholly redundant
>>process of forwarding everyone's emails to another
>>address.
>
>Would it be unrealistic to ask that you inform us of public comment
>deadlines and where we should send comments to -- or have the DNSO
>secretariat do it for you.  The DNSO website could be more helpful in
>providing information about approaching deadlines.
>
>Coordinating constituency responses may not be a bad idea.
>
>Adam
>
>
>
>
>
>>Here is the relevant info for submitting comments:
>  >Review TF - public comments open 11 Oct 2001
>>Review Report http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/20011010.NCreview-report.html
>>E-mail address for public comments comments-review at dnso.org
>>Archives http://www.dnso.org/dnso/dnsocomments/comments-review/Arc01/
>>
>>Just add comments-review at dnso.org into your
>>email and send it directly to DNSO.
>>
>>--MM
>>
>>>>>   Adam Peake <ajp at glocom.ac.jp> 10/24/01 07:44AM >>>
>>http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/20011011.NCteleconf-minutes.html
>>
>>>NC Task Forces
>>>
>>>-NC review interim report: Philip Sheppard said that this report was
>>>now being circulated for public comment until October 28 when the TF
>>>would look at the comments and produce the final report to be
>>>submitted to the NC on November 4 2001.
>>
>>
>>My comment:
>>
>>The task force system should be abolished and all DNSO policy making
>>conducted through the open processes: working groups.
>>
>>Best I remember there was no support for the creation of these small
>>closed Names Council driven "task forces" in the public DNSO review.
>>The DNSO working group D (Bret Fausett) did not recommend the
>>adoption of these closed and controlled groups.
>>
>>- - - -
>>
>>Perhaps other NCC members will have comments.
>>
>>Name Council representatives: could you please make sure all
>>constituency member comments are forwarded to the Council before Oct
>>28.
>>
>>It would also be helpful if you could try to give the constituency
>>notice of comment deadlines and similar. If keeping track of key
>>dates is difficult for you perhaps you could ask the DNSO secretariat
>>to keep a timetable and just forward that periodically to the list
>>(announcements?)
>>
>>Thanks,
>>
>>Adam
>>
>>Adam Peake
>>GLOCOM Tokyo
>>_______________________________________________
>>Discuss mailing list
>>Discuss at icann-ncc.org
>>http://www.icann-ncc.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Discuss mailing list
>>Discuss at icann-ncc.org
>>http://www.icann-ncc.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
>_______________________________________________
>Discuss mailing list
>Discuss at icann-ncc.org
>http://www.icann-ncc.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss