[ncdnhc-discuss] Need guidance on the Names Council GAC-country namesresolution
Nilda Vany Martinez Grajales
vany at sdnp.org.pa
Wed Oct 10 19:10:02 CEST 2001
Hi Milton:
I support your amendment proposal since is the spirit of the amendment
proposal I made initially to the first version of such resolution which
you can find below:
"4. The DNSO makes a call to ICANN Board and the GAC to all work
together in order to achieve a position regarding
country and geographical names that benefits both countries and domain
name registrants that would have legimit uses of a domain name that
coincides with such country and/or geographical names
5. once achieved such a position, send it to WIPO as the
Results of such work in behalf of ICANN/DNSO/GAC for consideration of
WIPO for future WIPO works regarding this issue."
http://www.icann-ncc.org/pipermail/discuss/2001-October/000344.html
Best Regards
Vany
Milton Mueller wrote:
>
> Members:
>
> The resolution proposed by the Business constituency is in
> many ways a good thing, because it opposes the recent
> GAC attempt to seize control of country names. I should point
> out that national governments have absolutely no
> internationally recognized, legal rights over the codes
> and names they are seeking.
>
> I have proposed the following amendment to the
> resolution:
>
> OLD:
> 4. That, due to the inherent complexity, the best forum for governments to seek solutions to the problems perceived by the GAC is the existing forum of such expertise, namely the inter-governmental specialised UN agency, the World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO).
>
> NEW: (amendments in CAPS)
> 4. That, due to the inherent complexity, the best forum for governments to seek solutions to the problems perceived by the GAC is the existing forum of INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY expertise, namely the inter-governmental specialised UN agency, the World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO), COMBINED WITH THE EXISTING FORUM FOR REPRESENTING THE INTERNET COMMUNITY IN POLICY MAKING,
> THE DNSO
>
> Apologies for lack of consultation, but we received the final
> version of this resolution today and the telecon is tomorrow.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at icann-ncc.org
> http://www.icann-ncc.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
--
Nilda Vany Martinez Grajales
Information Technology Specialist
Sustainable Development Networking Programme/Panama
Tel: (507) 317-0169
http://www.sdnp.org.pa
e-mail: vany at sdnp.org.pa
More information about the Ncuc-discuss
mailing list