[ncdnhc-discuss] Limit email sending....
Rob Courtney
rob at cdt.org
Tue Nov 27 20:53:32 CET 2001
You are right... rules need to be applied fairly. Having the Ad Com
members working on list admin is a step in that direction but maybe
not enough? The more the rules are applied, the better the list will
run.
A little slippage would not be disastrous though, as long as it's not
too much. If we want to avoid all slippage (i.e., we want true 100%
enforcement), maybe we need a technical solution?
r
At 2:09 PM -0500 11/27/01, Sarah Andrews wrote:
>Rob,
>
>I have to disagree. I think the aim in setting up such a system is
>to ensure that it is applied equally across the board. If in
>practice that proves unworkable then it may be time to revise but I
>do not think it is a good idea at the outset to admit that it will
>only be applied in select circumstances.
>
>-Sarah.
>
>>Well, I think it's unrealistic to expect the Ad Com to scrutinize
>>every poster's behavior, every day. I think the best we can do is
>>set a standard and trust the Ad Com to enforce that standard as
>>well as it can. I think the traffic cop analogy works well: it's
>>not possible to enforce a 65 MPH (or 100 KPH) speed limit on
>>everyone, but police enforce it enough to keep drivers' behavior on
>>the roads reasonable.
>>
>>If I get ticketed on the highway, I might complain that the
>>policeman singled me out out of the hundreds of people driving that
>>day -- but if I didn't want to pay the fine, I shouldn't have
>>exceeded the speed limit. As long as the standard is only enforced
>>against people who actually violate the rules, I don't have a real
>>problem with "selective" or "targeted" or "limited" enforcement,
>>whatever you want to call it.
>>
>>r
>>
>>P.S. And since there are five Ad Com members, you've effectively
>>got five traffic cops. So if one fails to perform responsibly, the
>>others can pick up the slack.
>>
>>At 12:42 PM -0600 11/27/01, Alejandro Pisanty - CUAED y FQ, UNAM wrote:
>>>Rob,
>>>
>>>the "selectively" part could be troublesome; would you please expand?
>>>
>>>Yours,
>>>
>>>Alx
>>>
>>>. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
>>> Dr. Alejandro Pisanty
>>>UNAM - Educacion Abierta y a Distancia
>>>Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico
>>>Tel. (+52-55) 5622-8713, 5622-8633 Fax 5550-8405
>>>NOTE NEW AREA CODE / POR FAVOR NOTE LOS NUEVOS NUMEROS DE L.D.
>>>http://www.cuaed.unam.mx Coordinacion de Universidad Abierta y Educacion a
>>>Distancia, UNAM (Open and Distance Education, UNAM)
>>>---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico, www.isoc.org
>>>=====>>> Participa en ICANN, www.icann.org
>>>---->> Internet y Sociedad? www.istf.org
>>>. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Discuss mailing list
>>Discuss at icann-ncc.org
>>http://www.icann-ncc.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
>_______________________________________________
>Discuss mailing list
>Discuss at icann-ncc.org
>http://www.icann-ncc.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
More information about the Ncuc-discuss
mailing list