[ncdnhc-discuss] Raul will be our Structure representative

[Nilda Vany Martinez Grajales]

Dear Chun:

Yes, the TFs in general can be composed by more than one member per
constituency if the ToR .  Also all constituencies nominees have
to have the full support of the three NCs constituency members, if you
read the rules of NC on TF, Committees and Working groups.  

The NCDNHC members at MdR agreed that the AdCom will vote one
representative for the TF on Structure from a list
of nominees provided by members, and such representative has being
elected, and is Raul Echeberria.

So, then any colaboration of other members has to be done in other ways
different than be sent as second non-voting representative of NCDNHC in
the TF on Structure, if the ToR of TF on Structure remains as are
proposed.

About adding subjects in the NCDNHC agenda, I think that all members has
the right to propose items to be discussed in the agenda of the NCDNHC. 
Actually I sent to the list a proposal of agenda and schedules, where I
included your request.  Also all members are invited to comment and make
contributions towards the agenda and schedules proposed.  

Best Regards
Vany




Chun Eung Hwi wrote:
> 
> Dear Vany,
> 
> I cannot understand why you cannot understand what I mean.
> I don't want to repeat this again later.
> 
> > The are rules already setted up within the Names Council regarding
> > composition of Task Forces, Committess and Working Groups. When I was
> > talking about Phillip answer, I wanted to mean
> > that since the rules of the specific Task Force on Structure indicates
> > that only one per constituency will be allowed
> > to participate, then it is logical to think that it won't be allowed two
> > representatives from the NCDNHC even in a non-voting status.
> 
> It is the comment period for ToR. Therefore, now the suggested ToR could
> be changed because it is not a finalized one. According to rules of
> procedure for DNSO, any TF should have at least one participant from all
> constituencies but it doesn't exclude the possibility of allowing two or
> more participants from costituencies in TF. Refer to the marked part of
> the sentence.
> 
> c) Task Force - a group equally representative of each NC constituency
> (typically one from each) and typically charged with forming a
>  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> recommendation to the NC or implementing an agreed NC action plan.
> (http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/20010711.NCprocedures-v3.0.html)
> 
> > I think that actually the NCDNHC hasn't developed yet an official
> > position regarding Task Forces, Committess and Working Groups.  If it is
> > wanted to develop such positions, I propose that we discuss it in the
> > list the proposals that may you
> > and Adam have to tell to the NCDNHC members, and vote on them.  After
> > such voting, the NCDNHC Names Council members are
> > able to expose such motion in the Names Council.
> > Do we also place in the agenda discussion about Task Forces, Committees
> > and Working Groups?
> 
> It could be done if you want to do that. As for me, I think that NCDNHC is
> not a poll research center.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Chun Eung Hwi
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> Chun Eung Hwi
> General Secretary, PeaceNet | phone:     (+82) 2- 583-3033
> Seoul Yangchun P.O.Box 81   |   pcs:     (+82) 019-259-2667
> Seoul, 158-600, Korea       | eMail:   ehchun at peacenet.or.kr
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at icann-ncc.org
> http://www.icann-ncc.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

-- 
Nilda Vany Martinez Grajales, BSEE
Information Technology Specialist
Sustainable Development Networking Programme/Panama
Member of the ICANN's DNSO Non-Commercial Constituency
Tel: (507) 317-0169
http://www.sdnp.org.pa
e-mail:  vany at sdnp.org.pa

Are you a Non-Commercial organization and have a domain name?
Join the ICANN's DNSO Non-Commercial Constituency, ncdnhc.icann-ncc.org